Work week endings may be calculated incorrectly. Observe the following:
$ for ww in {s,e}o{,p,n}ww
do printf "%s\t%s\n" $ww $(
faketime '2017-03-05 12:34:56' task calc $ww
); done
soww 2017-03-13T00:00:00
sopww 2017-02-27T00:00:00
sonww 2017-03-13T00:00:00
eoww 2017-03-10T23:59:59
eopww 2017-03-03T23:59:59
eonww 2017-03-17T23:59:59
with the reference date of 2017-03-05 12:34:56 (a Sunday), and the calendar:
$ ncal 03 2017
March 2017
Mo 6 13 20 27
Tu 7 14 21 28
We 1 8 15 22 29
Th 2 9 16 23 30
Fr 3 10 17 24 31
Sa 4 11 18 25
Su 5 12 19 26
9 10 11 12 13
these do not look right:
- It seems to consider the next "work week" to have already begun on Saturday, but I should think the next work week doesn't actually begin until Monday. Even though there's no actual work days left, it's still within the same work week.
soww and sonww are identical
eoww is earlier than soww (!)
This issue was noticed during testing for #47 (a change to comments documenting behavior of eo*) and is forked into a standalone issue as per the discussion there.
(test version of libshared was 591fa58)
Work week endings may be calculated incorrectly. Observe the following:
with the reference date of 2017-03-05 12:34:56 (a Sunday), and the calendar:
these do not look right:
sowwandsonwware identicaleowwis earlier thansoww(!)This issue was noticed during testing for #47 (a change to comments documenting behavior of
eo*) and is forked into a standalone issue as per the discussion there.(test version of
libsharedwas 591fa58)