Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
|
Have you looked at storing images on GitHub instead? I gave up on Docker Hub when they claimed I was a business (I'm not) and refused to give me open source creator access. Not sure how much space/how many images GitHub allows though, but I am using it for some of my open source projects and it's working well for me. Also what makes the images so big? Perhaps there are ways to trim them down? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hm, just found this thread and wondering what this means for the specific version dev tags currently on the github docker repo. I'm using the Can I expect that tag to stick around, or will it be cleaned up in the near future when development progresses? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The current
v2/v2_d/v2_k6/v2_dk6GitHub Actions andlatest/ki6/dev/dev_k6doesn't offer a frozen image/action. All of them has some degree of change. Thev2/v2_k6GitHub Actions andlatest/ki6changes with every release, and the others changes all the time.Why not having a tag for each release?
Images weight over than 1 GiB (more than 400 MiB compressed) and they are stored at Docker Hub. We can't create tons of them.
This discussion is to talk about solutions and what people considers is best. The reason I started it is because @neilenns and @KyleHunter complained about glitches found in the images (mostly because they were unintentionally using development images, see #213 and #221).
To avoid these problems I switched
v1andv1_k6to point to10.4-5.1.9andki6.0.5_Debian, which won't change. I also created two new tags:v2_1_2_0andv2_k6_1_2_0, both pointing to images that shouldn't change.These tags will be stable, but won't get bugs fixed.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions