VA state dataset overestimates high-income tax units by ~4x (impacts HB979 scoring) #548
Replies: 2 comments
-
Update: Ultra-High Income Analysis Across VA, AZ, and NYCritical finding: All three state datasets cap out at ~$6.5MNo PE state dataset has a single record above $10M in taxable income. The entire ultra-high-income tail is missing.
Top 20 records show hard ceilingAll three states have the same pattern — taxable income clusters in a narrow band near the maximum and then stops:
This looks like a systematic cap in the Enhanced CPS imputation — possibly CPS top-coding propagated into the state datasets. Comparison with actual tax return data$1M+ filers (PE vs actual):
$5M+ filers (PE vs actual):
$10M+ filers (PE vs actual):
The double distortionThe PE datasets have two simultaneous problems in the high-income tail:
This means:
Revenue impact on pending bills
Actual ultra-high income data (from state agencies)Arizona (AZ ADOR, TY 2022, residents only):
New York (NY DTF, TY 2022, all filers):
Note that NY's $10M+ filers alone hold $127.4 billion in income and pay $6.1B in state tax — and PE has zero representation of this group. Sources |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Data sources used in this analysisPE state datasets
IRS Statistics of Income (SOI)
State tax agency data
News / policy org sources (VA-specific)
NYC-specific
Other
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
While scoring Virginia HB979 (new 8% and 10% income tax brackets on high earners), we found that the Enhanced CPS state dataset for Virginia significantly overstates the number of high-income tax units, which inflates revenue estimates from high-earner tax provisions.
Context: state-legislative-tracker PR #70
The discrepancy
Source for actual data: Cardinal News citing VA tax return data (13,170 out of 4,063,070 returns report income over $1M).
Granular income distribution from PE's VA dataset (2027 projection)
Key observations:
Revenue impact
This overcount directly inflates revenue estimates for any policy targeting high earners:
The scaling ratio (13,170 / 56,413 = 0.23) is a rough adjustment -- the true correction depends on whether PE is overweighting existing high-income records vs imputing income that doesn't exist. But the magnitude of the discrepancy (4.3x) suggests this is a material data quality issue for high-income policy analysis.
Marginal income in each new bracket
For the HB979 reform specifically:
The >$1M bracket captures $112B in marginal income. If the actual figure is closer to $112B * 0.23 = ~$26B, the revenue from this bracket drops from $4.76B to ~$1.1B.
External validation points
PE's bracket-only estimate is 1.9x to 2.8x higher than external estimates.
Questions
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions