Date: 2025-05-29
- Total Tests: 104
- Passing: 104 (100%)
- Failing: 0
- Disabled: 0
- Total Enabled Tests: 220 (including new workaround test)
- Passing: 217
- Failing: 3
- Disabled: 99
Issue: Parser cannot handle else-if chains properly, reports "Statement expected" Workaround: Use nested if-else blocks instead (see RhoElseIfWorkaround.NestedIfInsteadOfElseIf)
Issue: Parser only processes first statement in multi-line programs with for loops Root Cause: Parser limitation with complex control structures
Issue: Same as above - for loop parsing limitation
During this session, we enabled 5 previously disabled tests:
- NestedIfStatements
- ComplexConditions (without parentheses)
- BasicWhileLoops
- NestedWhileLoops
- DoWhileLoops
Instead of:
if x == 1
result = 10
else if x == 2
result = 20
else
result = 30
Use:
if x == 1
result = 10
else
if x == 2
result = 20
else
result = 30
result = 0
if x == 1
result = 10
if x == 2
result = 20
if x == 3
result = 30
- Lambda expressions (23 tests)
- Pattern matching (5 tests)
- Error handling/try-catch (5 tests)
- Generators/yield (1 test)
- Break/continue statements (4 tests)
- Map literal syntax {} (5 tests)
- Method calls (.size(), .slice(), etc.) (18 tests)
- List comprehensions (10 tests)
- Recursion (4 tests)
- Nested function calls (2 tests)
- Function scoping with mutation (6 tests)
- For loops (8 tests)
- Else-if chains (4 tests)
- Complex multi-line programs (4 tests)
- Immediate: Use documented workarounds for else-if chains
- Short-term: Fix parser issues with for loops and multi-line programs
- Medium-term: Implement break/continue statements
- Long-term: Add lambda expressions as the next major feature
- Pi Language: Excellent (100% pass rate)
- Rho Language Core Features: Very Good (98.6% pass rate for enabled tests)
- Overall Project Health: Good (321/324 tests passing = 99.1%)