Added another ignore related to df for DataFrame names

Signed-off-by: Florian <[email protected]>

Author: schwarbf

pyproject.toml

@@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ ignore = [
   "F401",   # imported but unused; consider using `importlib.util.find_spec` to test for "
   "F811",   # "redefinition of the same function"
   "PL",     # Pylint
+  "PD901",  # Avoid using the generic variable name `df` for DataFrames
   "RUF002", # Docstring contains ambiguous `‑` (NON-BREAKING HYPHEN).
   "RUF003", # Comment contains ambiguous `‑` (NON-BREAKING HYPHEN).
   "RUF005", # Consider ... instead of concatenation
@@ -175,6 +176,7 @@ ignore = [
   "UP035",  # `typing.Set` is deprecated, use `set` instead"
 ]
 
+
 [tool.ruff.lint.pep8-naming]
 classmethod-decorators = [
   # Allow Pydantic's `@validator` decorator to trigger class method treatment.