You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The configuration describes the template’s current pragmatic Active Record-style architecture; it is not a Clean Architecture claim. It intentionally permits routes to use data/infrastructure code and preserves the existing data–infrastructure coupling.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Would you be open to a small, opt-in Deply baseline for the template?
The proposed PR would change only two files:
deply.yaml, copied from the published template recipe.There would be no CI, application code,
pyproject.toml,uv.lock, pre-commit, dependency, or generated-file changes.I tested the recipe against commit
c350936d2888ef16ff4f5549684fd8db54935a89:The configuration describes the template’s current pragmatic Active Record-style architecture; it is not a Clean Architecture claim. It intentionally permits routes to use data/infrastructure code and preserves the existing data–infrastructure coupling.
Deply: https://github.com/Vashkatsi/deply
Would maintainers want this two-file opt-in addition? I will not open a PR without explicit approval here.
All reactions