You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 3, 2026. It is now read-only.
What's the community thinking about RAGing, RAFTing or Fine-Tuning opensource models, for the specific purpose of DevOps, Sys-Admin, MLOps or for that matter any such task-domain?
From what I understood so far about gptscript, tools are the space where a user can express needs.
But in my (very) initial tests, just typing ls on the gptscript prompt (llm-basics-demo) is yielding this output.
my@dev1:~$ gptscript github.com/gptscript-ai/llm-basics-demo
Hello! I'm here to help you with any questions or information you might need. How can I assist you today?
> ls
It looks like you're using a command that is common in Unix-based systems to list directory contents. If you need help with
something specific related to this command or anything else, feel free to ask!
@Your Friendly Chat Assistant>
Every systems guy would expect a different output to the ls prompt.
What are your thoughts on:
the LLM "powering" gptscript having some background knowledge related to the intentions of the user?
which of RAG, RAFT or Fine-tuning could/would work better? Or are foundational models (remember, their knowledge is old) already the best fit?
What's the community thinking about RAGing, RAFTing or Fine-Tuning opensource models, for the specific purpose of DevOps, Sys-Admin, MLOps or for that matter any such task-domain?
From what I understood so far about gptscript, tools are the space where a user can express needs.
But in my (very) initial tests, just typing
lson the gptscript prompt (llm-basics-demo) is yielding this output.Every systems guy would expect a different output to the
lsprompt.What are your thoughts on:
Thanks for your views!