CA: update k8s deps to 1.35.0-rc.0

[jackfrancis]

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR brings in the 1.35 Kubernetes deps in preparation for a 1.35 release of CA.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #8742

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

update k8s deps to 1.35.0-alpha.3

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• cluster-autoscaler/OWNERS [jackfrancis]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jackfrancis]

@towca this PR aims to bring in the DeviceClassResolver addition w/ the 1.35 k8s dependencies

cc @gnufied you should be able to rebase your CSI changs on top of this (it will be better to have a discrete PR that brings in changes from updates to k8s dependencies)

[gnufied]

That is fine. I will rebase.

[jackfrancis]

credit to @gnufied for saving me time having to figure out this one 🙏

[jackfrancis]

/test pull-cluster-autoscaler-e2e-azure-master

[elmiko]

looks like an error with a go.sum file, but the units are fine.

/retest

[jackfrancis]

/retitle CA: update k8s deps to 1.35.0-rc.0

[jackfrancis]

/label tide/merge-method-squash

[jackfrancis]

@jackfrancis Did you end up figuring out the DRA enablement issue? We could technically replace the feature-gate-based defaulting logic with actually explicitly modifying the scheduler config to add/remove the DRA plugin used to create the scheduler framework. But it probably makes more sense to just drop it and always include the plugin at this point, WDYT?

Left some non-blocking comments, but in general LGTM! Thanks for taking care of this Jack!

/lgtm

Let's do that in a follow-up (prior to 1.35.0 CA release) so we can land this ASAP and unblock @gnufied

[gnufied]

/lgtm

[jackfrancis]

/hold for E2E

[elmiko]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[k8s-ci-robot]

@jackfrancis: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-cluster-autoscaler-e2e-azure-master	1ffecac	link	false	/test pull-cluster-autoscaler-e2e-azure-master

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.