Skip to content

Conversation

@annashamray
Copy link
Contributor

@annashamray annashamray marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2025 13:28
@swrichards
Copy link
Collaborator

@annashamray In essence this looks good, I was just a bit concerned that the "convenience method" paradigm did not quite fit the client.Resource.verb() naming pattern, so I moved things around a bit in #4 to give us:

client.methods.maak_klant_contact(data=data)

With .methods aiding discoverability for such methods (there's only one 1 so far, I expect there'll be more). Mostly because they involve several resources, so it might be nice to indicate that in the client namespacing.

Let me know what you think!

@annashamray
Copy link
Contributor Author

I like it, it's nice that there is a separation between resources and convenience endpoints now
I'll close this PR and review #4

@annashamray annashamray closed this Dec 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Updating data to klanten service

3 participants