[Event Request] Codeunit 415 "Release Purchase Document" procedure PerformManualReopen

[cc-chku]

Why do you need this change?

I would like to be able to intervene when resetting the status of a purchase document if its status is “Pending Approval.”
Similar to the option on the sales side.

Describe the request

Please implement this in the same way as on the "Release Sales Document" Codeunit in procedure "PerformManualReopen".

New Function "CheckReopenStatus(PurchaseHeader)" at the beginning of the procedure "PerformManualReopen"

    local procedure CheckReopenStatus(SalesHeader: Record "Purchase Header")
    var
        IsHandled: Boolean;
    begin
        IsHandled := false;
        OnBeforeCheckReopenStatus(PurchaseHeader, IsHandled);
        if IsHandled then
            exit;

        if PurchaseHeader.Status = PurchaseHeader.Status::"Pending Approval" then
            Error(Text003);
    end;

[github-actions]

Hi @cc-chku,

Thank you for your extensibility request. To help us process it efficiently, please update the issue to include the required information.

📚 Extensibility Guidelines

Missing Information:

• Existing extensibility review: Explain which existing events or alternative extensibility patterns you evaluated and why they are insufficient for this scenario.
• IsHandled justification: Explain why an IsHandled/bypass pattern is required instead of a regular event or a different design.
• Execution frequency / performance impact: Describe how often this logic is expected to run and any performance considerations.
• Sensitive data exposure: Confirm whether the requested event would expose any sensitive data.
• Multiple extension interaction risks: Describe any expected risks or considerations if multiple extensions subscribe to the handled event and potentially conflict.

Please update the issue with the missing details. We'll automatically re-analyze once updated.

Note

Automatically generated by the Triage Agent — advisory only. An engineer will review before any action is taken.

Tip

Not accurate? Reply with /not-accurate (optional: add a short explanation). Your feedback improves future responses.

[cc-chku]

/not-accurate
The request is very clear and i think there should be no discussion, that it is a good idea to align existing sales and purchase functionalities.

[github-actions]

✅ Feedback recorded
Thanks — your /not-accurate feedback has been logged and will be reviewed.