diff --git a/content/about/membership/_index.md b/content/about/membership/_index.md index 3e244e4c..e91af6a9 100644 --- a/content/about/membership/_index.md +++ b/content/about/membership/_index.md @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ sections: - Leading the development of a [research software funders community](/forums/funders-forum/) that has engaged 60+ funding organisations in its goal to address common challenges to achieve the significant cultural change needed across the research sector and better coordinate investment globally. See [Amsterdam Declaration on Funding Research Software Sustainability](https://adore.software/declaration/). + - Convening and co-hosting stakeholder forums across the research software ecosystem, including forums focused on [community leadership](https://www.researchsoft.org/forums/community-leadership-forum/), [infrastructure](https://www.researchsoft.org/forums/rsi-forum/), [policy](https://www.researchsoft.org/forums/rsp-forum/), [funding](https://www.researchsoft.org/forums/funders-forum/), [publishing](https://www.researchsoft.org/forums/pubsoft-forum/), [skills and training](https://www.researchsoft.org/forums/stars-forum/), and [metascience](https://www.researchsoft.org/forums/mars-forum/), as well as the [International Council of RSE Associations](https://researchsoftware.org/council.html). - Engaging with the OECD’s 2025-26 program of work on [Policies for research software in the age of artificial intelligence](https://www.oecd.org/en/events/2026/03/access-to-research-software-opportunities-and-challenges.html), [OECD Recommendation on Access to Research Data from Public Funding](https://www.oecd.org/sti/recommendation-access-to-research-data-from-public-funding.htm) and [UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science](https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-future/open-science/recommendation), which has led to the inclusion of research software in key international policy and [toolkits](https://www.unesco.org/en/open-science/toolkit-fostering-open-science-practices). - Co-leading improved recognition of research software policy at the institutional level through the [Policies in Research Organisations for Research Software (PRO4RS) Working Group](https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/rda-resa-policies-research-organisations-research-software-pro4rs/members/all-members/), which created the research software policy database, informed institutional guidance, and published [Identifying Gaps in Research Software Policy](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15411757). - Co-leading the drafting of the [FAIR for Research Software Principles](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-022-01710-x) which engaged 500+ community members. [Positive signals of adoption](/blog/2024-03/) demonstrate high levels of community support.