-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
DST Commitments proposal Q1 2026 #344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…th-regression` and `vac:dst:waku:2025q4-waku-evaluation:nwaku-v0.37-store-regression`
fbarbu15
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, LGTM so far, left some minor comments
Will discuss it also with Ksr later this week and come back with final comments
| ### Blend benchmarking | ||
| > *Note*: This was moved from previous quarter | ||
| * fully qualified name: `vac:dst:nomos:2026q1-nomos-evaluation:nomos-blendnet-benchmarking` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think nomos in task name is overkill, I propose:
vac:dst:nomos:2026q1-nomos-evaluation:blendnet-benchmarking
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same for the others
|
|
||
| Perform a comparison between nim-libp2p using quic and waku using mplex and yamux. | ||
|
|
||
| Schedule note: Dates reflect quarter bounds; update when actual timing is known. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe group the notes together
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ### nWaku v0.37 bandwidth regression |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this can be extracted in a separate PR if we need to merge it quicker
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nah its ok, don't worry
Draft version of the 2026Q1 commitments.
I maintained old names, but I guess this can be changed to logos-* if necessary.