WhereBulkContains method supports checking Ids for multiple fields

[pvarets00101]

It's throwing an error now "Oops! only 1 key name is currently supported."
Code:

var ids = new List<string> {"id1", "Id2"};
entities.WhereBulkContains(ids, new List<string> {"Field1", "Field2"});

Is support for such functionality being considered?

[JonathanMagnan]

Hello @pvarets00101 ,

You currently have a list of strings but are trying to use two keys.

The code already works if your list contains entities, for example:

var list = new List<Inventory>() { new Inventory() { ID = 1, ColumnInt = 0 } };
var results = context.Inventories.WhereBulkContains(list, new List<string>() { "ID", "ColumnInt" }).ToList();

So, if you need to map the same value to multiple keys, you can use something like an anonymous type and duplicate the value instead of a simple list of strings.

Best Regards,

Jon

[pvarets00101]

Hello @JonathanMagnan
Thanks for the answer.

Yes, I know there is such a way, but creating a new List() { new Inventory() { ID = 1, ColumnInt = 0 } } with more than 10k entries is too expensive.
I know that the WhereBulkContains method supports the following functionality

var items = dbContext.Set<TEntity>()
                .WhereBulkContains(ids, propertyName)
                .ToList();

At the time of execution, I only have a List ids, which can contain thousands of values, and I would like to be able to pass a list of ids to the WhereBulkContains method and check ids for multiple fields.

var propertyNames = new List<string> { "Id", "ParentId", ...};
var items = dbContext.Set<TEntity>()
                .WhereBulkContains(ids, propertyNames)
                .ToList();

I would like such functionality.
Maybe I don't fully understand.

[JonathanMagnan]

Hello @pvarets00101 ,

You’re probably also looking for an OR condition instead of an AND, such as Field1 = id OR Field2 = id.

If that’s the case, unfortunately, we currently don’t support this scenario. We have a lot of new features planned for 2026, but for now, this specific case isn’t supported. We’ll make sure to add your request to our backlog.

Best Regards,

Jon