feat(stats)!: implement additional metric tags in libdd-trace-stats by duncanpharvey · Pull Request #2170 · DataDog/libdatadog

duncanpharvey · 2026-06-26T19:06:02Z

What does this PR do?

A brief description of the change being made with this pull request.

Motivation

What inspired you to submit this pull request?

Additional Notes

Follows #1815.

How to test the change?

Describe here in detail how the change can be validated.

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 · 2026-06-26T19:06:55Z

✨ Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 16 Pipeline jobs failed

Coverage | coverage

Lint | clippy #ubuntu-latest msrv

Lint | clippy #ubuntu-latest nightly

View all 16 failed jobs.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: fc99d32 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

github-actions · 2026-06-26T19:08:16Z

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 3265 documentation warning(s) found

📦 `datadog-ipc` - 967 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 1205 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-protobuf` - 227 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 866 warning(s)

Updated: 2026-06-26 19:08:15 UTC | Commit: c53abcf | missing-docs job results

github-actions · 2026-06-26T19:08:34Z

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Comparing clippy allow annotations between branches:

Base Branch: origin/main
PR Branch: origin/duncan-harvey/libdd-trace-stats-additional-metric-tags

Summary by Rule

Rule	Base Branch	PR Branch	Change
unwrap_used	1	1	No change (0%)
Total	1	1	No change (0%)

Annotation Counts by File

File	Base Branch	PR Branch	Change
`libdd-trace-stats/src/stats_exporter.rs`	1	1	No change (0%)

Annotation Stats by Crate

Crate	Base Branch	PR Branch	Change
`clippy-annotation-reporter`	5	5	No change (0%)
`datadog-ffe-ffi`	1	1	No change (0%)
`datadog-ipc`	22	22	No change (0%)
`datadog-live-debugger`	4	4	No change (0%)
`datadog-live-debugger-ffi`	10	10	No change (0%)
`datadog-profiling-replayer`	4	4	No change (0%)
`datadog-sidecar`	45	45	No change (0%)
`libdd-common`	13	13	No change (0%)
`libdd-common-ffi`	12	12	No change (0%)
`libdd-data-pipeline`	6	6	No change (0%)
`libdd-ddsketch`	2	2	No change (0%)
`libdd-dogstatsd-client`	1	1	No change (0%)
`libdd-profiling`	13	13	No change (0%)
`libdd-remote-config`	3	3	No change (0%)
`libdd-telemetry`	20	20	No change (0%)
`libdd-tinybytes`	4	4	No change (0%)
`libdd-trace-normalization`	2	2	No change (0%)
`libdd-trace-obfuscation`	3	3	No change (0%)
`libdd-trace-stats`	1	1	No change (0%)
`libdd-trace-utils`	11	11	No change (0%)
Total	182	182	No change (0%)

About This Report

This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.

github-actions · 2026-06-26T19:09:58Z

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 14 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 `datadog-ipc` - 5 error(s)

Show output

error[unmaintained]: Bincode is unmaintained
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:25:1
   │
25 │ bincode 1.3.3 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Due to a doxxing and harassment incident, the bincode team has taken the decision to cease development permanently.
     
     The team considers version 1.3.3 a complete version of bincode that is not in need of any updates.
     
     ## Alternatives to consider
     
     * [wincode](https://crates.io/crates/wincode)
     * [postcard](https://crates.io/crates/postcard)
     * [bitcode](https://crates.io/crates/bitcode)
     * [rkyv](https://crates.io/crates/rkyv)
   ├ Announcement: https://git.sr.ht/~stygianentity/bincode/tree/v3.0/item/README.md
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ bincode v1.3.3
     └── datadog-ipc v0.1.0

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:205:1
    │
205 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   │       └── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:233:1
    │
233 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:233:1
    │
233 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:233:1
    │
233 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 5 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:218:1
    │
218 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:245:1
    │
245 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:245:1
    │
245 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:245:1
    │
245 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:286:1
    │
286 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-trace-protobuf` - ✅ No issues

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 4 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:193:1
    │
193 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:220:1
    │
220 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:220:1
    │
220 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:220:1
    │
220 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-06-26 19:09:58 UTC | Commit: c53abcf | dependency-check job results

duncanpharvey added 5 commits June 24, 2026 14:38

implement additional_metrics_tags in libdd-trace-stats

1c25e73

update and add tests

1efdd88

sort, dedupe, and cap additional metric tags at 4

0aeaf8a

set max length of additional metric tag value to 200

a94c64d

enforce per-bucket cardinality limit on additional_metric_tags

fc99d32

github-actions Bot added the data-pipeline label Jun 26, 2026

duncanpharvey mentioned this pull request Jun 26, 2026

feat(stats)!: implement span derived primary tags in libdd-trace-stats #1815

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

feat(stats)!: implement additional metric tags in libdd-trace-stats#2170

feat(stats)!: implement additional metric tags in libdd-trace-stats#2170
duncanpharvey wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
duncan-harvey/libdd-trace-stats-additional-metric-tags

duncanpharvey commented Jun 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jun 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Uh oh!

Conversation

duncanpharvey commented Jun 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Additional Notes

How to test the change?

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jun 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

⚠️ Warnings

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

📚 Documentation Check Results

📦 datadog-ipc - 967 warning(s)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1205 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-protobuf - 227 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 866 warning(s)

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Summary by Rule

Annotation Counts by File

Annotation Stats by Crate

About This Report

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

📦 datadog-ipc - 5 error(s)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 5 error(s)

📦 libdd-trace-protobuf - ✅ No issues

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 4 error(s)

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

duncanpharvey commented Jun 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jun 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

📦 `datadog-ipc` - 967 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 1205 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-protobuf` - 227 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 866 warning(s)

📦 `datadog-ipc` - 5 error(s)

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 5 error(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-protobuf` - ✅ No issues

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 4 error(s)