Introduce CODEOWNERS file - #4477
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 issue found across 1 file
Confidence score: 4/5
- In
.github/CODEOWNERS, the lack of a default*owner leaves much of the repository—including unlisted areas ofeditor/—without automatic review ownership, which can allow changes to bypass the intended CODEOWNERS review path; add a default owner or explicitly cover the remaining paths.
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name=".github/CODEOWNERS">
<violation number="1" location=".github/CODEOWNERS:22">
P3: This CODEOWNERS introduces owners only for a subset of paths and defines no default (`*`) owner, so most of the repository — the repo root, the bulk of `editor/` outside the listed `messages/` submodules, the `node-graph/` core, and `libraries/` — will not require any owner review. For a PR whose purpose is introducing CODEOWNERS, review coverage of the codebase will be limited to the listed directories. If the intent is to enforce owner review beyond these components, add a fallback such as `* @Keavon` (or another maintainer); otherwise confirm the scoped coverage is deliberate.</violation>
</file>
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Re-trigger cubic
| @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ | |||
| # Keavon Chambers (@Keavon keavon@keavon.com) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: This CODEOWNERS introduces owners only for a subset of paths and defines no default (*) owner, so most of the repository — the repo root, the bulk of editor/ outside the listed messages/ submodules, the node-graph/ core, and libraries/ — will not require any owner review. For a PR whose purpose is introducing CODEOWNERS, review coverage of the codebase will be limited to the listed directories. If the intent is to enforce owner review beyond these components, add a fallback such as * @Keavon (or another maintainer); otherwise confirm the scoped coverage is deliberate.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At .github/CODEOWNERS, line 22:
<comment>This CODEOWNERS introduces owners only for a subset of paths and defines no default (`*`) owner, so most of the repository — the repo root, the bulk of `editor/` outside the listed `messages/` submodules, the `node-graph/` core, and `libraries/` — will not require any owner review. For a PR whose purpose is introducing CODEOWNERS, review coverage of the codebase will be limited to the listed directories. If the intent is to enforce owner review beyond these components, add a fallback such as `* @Keavon` (or another maintainer); otherwise confirm the scoped coverage is deliberate.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+
+/desktop/ @timon-schelling
+
+/editor/src/messages/future/ @timon-schelling
+/editor/src/messages/resource_storage/ @timon-schelling
+/editor/src/messages/network/ @timon-schelling
</file context>
No description provided.