Skip to content

Introduce CODEOWNERS file - #4477

Open
timon-schelling wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
codeowners-file
Open

Introduce CODEOWNERS file#4477
timon-schelling wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
codeowners-file

Conversation

@timon-schelling

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 issue found across 1 file

Confidence score: 4/5

  • In .github/CODEOWNERS, the lack of a default * owner leaves much of the repository—including unlisted areas of editor/—without automatic review ownership, which can allow changes to bypass the intended CODEOWNERS review path; add a default owner or explicitly cover the remaining paths.
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.


<file name=".github/CODEOWNERS">

<violation number="1" location=".github/CODEOWNERS:22">
P3: This CODEOWNERS introduces owners only for a subset of paths and defines no default (`*`) owner, so most of the repository — the repo root, the bulk of `editor/` outside the listed `messages/` submodules, the `node-graph/` core, and `libraries/` — will not require any owner review. For a PR whose purpose is introducing CODEOWNERS, review coverage of the codebase will be limited to the listed directories. If the intent is to enforce owner review beyond these components, add a fallback such as `* @Keavon` (or another maintainer); otherwise confirm the scoped coverage is deliberate.</violation>
</file>

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.

Re-trigger cubic

Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
# Keavon Chambers (@Keavon keavon@keavon.com)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P3: This CODEOWNERS introduces owners only for a subset of paths and defines no default (*) owner, so most of the repository — the repo root, the bulk of editor/ outside the listed messages/ submodules, the node-graph/ core, and libraries/ — will not require any owner review. For a PR whose purpose is introducing CODEOWNERS, review coverage of the codebase will be limited to the listed directories. If the intent is to enforce owner review beyond these components, add a fallback such as * @Keavon (or another maintainer); otherwise confirm the scoped coverage is deliberate.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At .github/CODEOWNERS, line 22:

<comment>This CODEOWNERS introduces owners only for a subset of paths and defines no default (`*`) owner, so most of the repository — the repo root, the bulk of `editor/` outside the listed `messages/` submodules, the `node-graph/` core, and `libraries/` — will not require any owner review. For a PR whose purpose is introducing CODEOWNERS, review coverage of the codebase will be limited to the listed directories. If the intent is to enforce owner review beyond these components, add a fallback such as `* @Keavon` (or another maintainer); otherwise confirm the scoped coverage is deliberate.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+
+/desktop/ @timon-schelling
+
+/editor/src/messages/future/ @timon-schelling
+/editor/src/messages/resource_storage/ @timon-schelling
+/editor/src/messages/network/ @timon-schelling
</file context>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant