Skip to content

Create rule S7456: skip(0) should not be used on iterators #4841

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
ghislainpiot merged 4 commits into from
Dec 4, 2025
Merged

Create rule S7456: skip(0) should not be used on iterators #4841

ghislainpiot merged 4 commits into from
Dec 4, 2025

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Mar 26, 2025

You can preview this rule here (updated a few minutes after each push).

Review

A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:

  • logical errors and incorrect information
  • information gaps and missing content
  • text style and tone
  • PR summary and labels follow the guidelines

@github-actions github-actions bot added the rust label Mar 26, 2025
@sallaigy sallaigy changed the title Create rule S7456 Create rule S7456: skip(0) should not be used on iterators Mar 26, 2025
@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Mar 26, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Mar 26, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@sallaigy sallaigy force-pushed the rule/add-RSPEC-S7456 branch from 2b290d6 to 36fd241 Compare September 30, 2025 12:06
@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@sallaigy sallaigy marked this pull request as ready for review September 30, 2025 12:17
@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@ghislainpiot ghislainpiot added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 2f14fe4 Dec 4, 2025
10 of 12 checks passed
@ghislainpiot ghislainpiot deleted the rule/add-RSPEC-S7456 branch December 4, 2025 08:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yassin-kammoun-sonarsource yassin-kammoun-sonarsource yassin-kammoun-sonarsource approved these changes

Assignees

@sallaigy sallaigy

Labels

rust

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@yassin-kammoun-sonarsource @sallaigy @ghislainpiot