Fix 2 flow control stalls

[Dreamsorcerer]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.00%. Comparing base (8c8906a) to head (7f79c32).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #13504   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.00%   99.00%           
=======================================
  Files         132      132           
  Lines       49635    49697   +62     
  Branches     2575     2577    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        49141    49203   +62     
  Misses        370      370           
  Partials      124      124           

Flag	Coverage Δ
Autobahn	22.03% <13.15%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
CI-GHA	98.91% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-Linux	98.69% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
OS-Windows	97.01% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-macOS	97.93% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.10	98.13% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.11	98.37% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.12	98.46% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.13	98.45% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.14	98.46% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.14t	97.56% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-pypy-3.11	97.39% <97.36%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
VM-macos	97.93% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-ubuntu	98.69% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
VM-windows	97.01% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
cython-coverage	82.94% <96.05%> (+0.68%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[greptile-apps]

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge because no blocking failure remains.

No blocking failure remains.

_{Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "Apply suggestion from @Dreamsorcerer" | Re-trigger Greptile}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 84 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 83 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing fix-stall (7f79c32) with master (8c8906a)²}

Footnotes

1. 83 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on master (dfdcc7d) during the generation of this report, so 8c8906a was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩