-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 565
Enable nested field statistics with inferred metrics limit #3810
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jkasireddy
wants to merge
1
commit into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
jkasireddy:fix/2699-nested-metrics
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+340
−19
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If
write.metadata.metrics.defaultis explicitly set (say, to 'full'), wouldn't we still wantwrite.metadata.metrics.max-inferred-column-defaultsto apply? in fact, isn't that when limiting is most important?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@greenlaw
Good question. I had considered that as well, but I intentionally made an explicitly configured
write.metadata.metrics.defaultbypasswrite.metadata.metrics.max-inferred-column-defaultsto match the current Java MetricsConfig behavior.In the Java implementation, max-inferred-column-defaults is applied only when there is no explicitly configured default. If
write.metadata.metrics.default=fullis set, that is treated as an explicit user choice and the mode applies to all columns. Explicit per-column overrides similarly take precedence over the inferred limit.Since the property is specifically max-inferred-column-defaults, I interpreted the limit as protecting the automatically inferred default behavior rather than overriding an explicit global configuration.
That said, I agree that limiting an explicit full default could also be useful for controlling manifest size. If we want PyIceberg to behave differently here, I’m happy to adjust it, but that would diverge from the current Java behavior. Would you prefer that we preserve Java parity for this PR?