Skip to content

small spelling and grammar fixups to news285#1475

Merged
bitschmidty merged 1 commit intobitcoinops:masterfrom
LarryRuane:news-285-fixes
Jan 19, 2024
Merged

small spelling and grammar fixups to news285#1475
bitschmidty merged 1 commit intobitcoinops:masterfrom
LarryRuane:news-285-fixes

Conversation

@LarryRuane
Copy link
Collaborator

Follow-up to #1468, I was unavailabale to review pre-merge

Copy link
Contributor

@bitschmidty bitschmidty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noticing a missing period after the lede as well. Will defer to @harding on these other suggestions/updates.

@LarryRuane
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Good catch, Mike, I force-pushed that fix (add the missing period).

@LarryRuane
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Force-pushed to resolve merge conflicts with #1476 (podcast timestamps).

Copy link
Collaborator

@murchandamus murchandamus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK except comment on funds

Comment on lines +264 to +265
transactions (HTLC-X transactions). If the funding party doesn't have
much funds in the channel and if feerates rise, the funding party may
not be able accept a new incoming payment because they don't have
many funds in the channel and if feerates rise, the funding party may
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Much" seems right to me. Isn’t funds an uncountable noun? Either way, perhaps:

Suggested change
transactions (HTLC-X transactions). If the funding party doesn't have
much funds in the channel and if feerates rise, the funding party may
not be able accept a new incoming payment because they don't have
many funds in the channel and if feerates rise, the funding party may
transactions (HTLC-X transactions). If the funding party is low on
funds in the channel and if feerates rise, the funding party may

@LarryRuane
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Force-pushed Murch's suggestion, I like that much better than what I suggested, thanks!

@bitschmidty bitschmidty merged commit 0445858 into bitcoinops:master Jan 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants