Delete AI generated image

[Avstraliya]

I do not think AI generated imagery, especially the type that clearly was copied straight from the generator without any attempts at cleanup of artifacts, should have place in this repo.

[netocrs]

Why not raise an Issue instead of taking the liberty to delete someone else's contribution?

And can you please provide in details the reasons AI-generated images shouldn't be in the repo you don't directly own or didn't authored? Because there's no line in the Contribution Guidelines that forbids that, and just "feeling like" is not a valid reason in my opinion..

[GabiBrawl]

I have to agree with this one, AI slop is getting out of hand and it's not good in any aspects

[Dragan232]

the reasons AI-generated images shouldn't be in the repo

It was done based on the owner's own opinion.
#618 (comment)

One can clearly tell it is AI by the oddly distorted text.

[netocrs]

the reasons AI-generated images shouldn't be in the repo

It was done based on the owner's own opinion. #618 (comment)

One can clearly tell it is AI by the oddly distorted text.

It's understandable when the anime character is AI-generated, but from what I see that is happening here, is that the book is being added using an AI Image Model. Since we're mostly developers (I assume) and not photoshoppers, some are taking a real anime image and using an AI Image Model to add the book.

[Dragan232]

the reasons AI-generated images shouldn't be in the repo

It was done based on the owner's own opinion. #618 (comment)
One can clearly tell it is AI by the oddly distorted text.

It's understandable when the anime character is AI-generated, but from what I see that is happening here, is that the book is being added using an AI Image Model. Since we're mostly developers (I assume) and not photoshoppers, some are taking a real anime image and using an AI Image Model to add the book.

There's also issues with the fingers, the patch on the jacket(?), and the birds in the background.

[fcolecumberri]

I understand your point of view. However it would have been better if instead of phrasing it as I do not think AI generated imagery should have place in this repo. where it seems like you are imposing your opinion into the repo, you should have focused into the quality of the image. Something like This image is ugly and soulless AI-slop.

Personally speaking (and I think many people may share my opinion while many others disagree), I think AI can be used to create impressive masterpieces and I would hate to miss them just because those were made with a difusión model in the pipeline. However, it's very easy to produce garbage that might need to be cleaned up. I think that is the spirit of #618 (comment) .

Also the same can be said about many tools in Photoshop/Gimp/Krita/etc. There are many tools that can produce masterpieces or garbage. In this repo is common to see PR about image cleaning and fixing, not just for AI.

So if we focus into the quality of the image. It is ugly, and soulless and it should be removed or fixed (This part should not be controversial).

[Avstraliya]

Tweaked PR description per @fcolecumberri's advice.