Handle "No route to host" message on macOS#39
Open
xwang1498 wants to merge 1 commit intodenilsonsa:masterfrom
Open
Handle "No route to host" message on macOS#39xwang1498 wants to merge 1 commit intodenilsonsa:masterfrom
xwang1498 wants to merge 1 commit intodenilsonsa:masterfrom
Conversation
xwang1498
force-pushed
the
macos-no-route-to-host
branch
from
721f1bc to
eb9fb64
Compare
|
Excited to see this feature available. |
Contributor
Author
@mostafabayat Also looking forward to @denilsonsa merging this in. In the meantime, please consider my fork here which has this and several other bug fixes + improvements: https://github.com/xwang1498/prettyping |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On macOS, if your network connection goes down, the prettyping output will be trashed with lots of
ping: sendto: No route to hostlines.We should just ignore these, because we'll still get the necessary
Request timeout for icmp_seq ...line soon after.Closes #24. Closes #25 which also tries to solve this problem but double counts lost packets.