Skip to content

Make it easy to fix and free energy offset#139

Merged
henrikjacobsenfys merged 4 commits intodevelopfrom
energy-offset
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

Make it easy to fix and free energy offset#139
henrikjacobsenfys merged 4 commits intodevelopfrom
energy-offset

Conversation

@henrikjacobsenfys
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Make it easy to fix and free energy offset during analysis

@henrikjacobsenfys henrikjacobsenfys added [scope] enhancement Adds/improves features (major.MINOR.patch) [priority] medium Normal/default priority labels Mar 25, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 25, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.78%. Comparing base (cec1976) to head (bfa68b7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #139      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    97.75%   97.78%   +0.03%     
===========================================
  Files           37       37              
  Lines         2493     2530      +37     
  Branches       422      434      +12     
===========================================
+ Hits          2437     2474      +37     
  Misses          32       32              
  Partials        24       24              
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 49.48% <27.50%> (-0.38%) ⬇️
unittests 97.78% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rozyczko rozyczko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Comment on lines +384 to +385
raise TypeError(f'Q_index must be an int or None, got {type(Q_index).__name__}')

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This raises TypeError but similar check in analysis_base in _verify_Q_index raises IndexError.
IndexError is probably a better choice.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think TypeError is correct, so I've updated analysis_base. Also makes the logic easier to follow in _verify_Q_index

@henrikjacobsenfys henrikjacobsenfys merged commit e072df7 into develop Mar 31, 2026
34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

[priority] medium Normal/default priority [scope] enhancement Adds/improves features (major.MINOR.patch)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants