-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.1k
Propagate model field defaults to ModelSerializer fields #9997
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
M2004GV
wants to merge
7
commits into
encode:main
Choose a base branch
from
M2004GV:propagate-model-field-defaults
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+153
−3
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f0b06c2
Propagate model field defaults to ModelSerializer fields
M2004GV f632454
Include non-callable field defaults in OPTIONS metadata
M2004GV 4c81c34
test: add callable and choice field default tests for ModelSerializer
M2004GV 1abd73c
test: verify model field defaults appear in OpenAPI schema
M2004GV 887edde
Potential fix for pull request finding
auvipy 961f8c7
docs: clarify default propagation excludes relational fields
M2004GV ffe17a5
test: cover relational field scope for propagated defaults
M2004GV File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@M2004GV please cross check this suggestion and others relevant ones
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@auvipy, cross-checked both suggestions. Relational defaults are intentionally not propagated, a FK model default is a PK value, while a serializer field default goes into
validated_dataas is (noto_internal_value), so propagating it would break.create(). Documented this scope in the docs and locked it in with a test. The full-update test from your autofix is kept as is (plus a missing blank line fix for flake8).