Skip to content

Conversation

@eschizoid
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@eschizoid eschizoid requested a review from Copilot September 3, 2025 04:39
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR implements server enhancements for the code analysis system, focusing on improving robustness and adding comprehensive property-based testing.

  • Replaces try-catch error handling with functional error handling patterns using runCatching
  • Adds extensive property-based testing for the CodeContentProcessor with support for multiple programming languages
  • Removes unused imports and optimizes import statements across test files

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 8 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
RepositoryAnalysisServiceTest.kt Removes unused Exception import
ModelContextServiceTest.kt Replaces wildcard import with specific mockk import
CodeContentProcessorPropertyTest.kt Adds comprehensive property-based tests for multi-language code processing
AppConfigTest.kt Replaces wildcard import with specific assertEquals import
RepositoryAnalysisService.kt Refactors error handling from try-catch to functional style using runCatching
Mcp.kt Improves SSE connection handling and removes unused imports
CodeContentProcessor.kt Refactors processing logic with improved documentation and functional approach
CodeAnalyzer.kt Replaces try-catch with runCatching and removes unused imports
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/main/kotlin/mcp/code/analysis/processor/CodeContentProcessor.kt:1

  • The string template escape ${'$'} is unnecessarily complex. Use \$ instead for better readability."
package mcp.code.analysis.processor

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +33 to +41
data class Pass1(val flags: MutableList<Boolean>, val inBlock: Boolean)

val pass1 =
lines.foldIndexed(Pass1(mutableListOf<Boolean>(), false)) { idx, acc, line ->
val trimmed = line.trim()
val nextInCommentBlock = determineCommentBlockState(trimmed, state.inCommentBlock)
val shouldIncludeLine = isDefinition(line) || isCommentLine(line) || state.inCommentBlock

val updatedLines =
if (shouldIncludeLine) {
when {
isDefinition(line) -> state.lines + processDefinitionLine(line)
else -> state.lines + line
}
} else {
state.lines
}

ProcessingState(updatedLines, nextInCommentBlock)
val shouldInclude = isDefinition(line) || isCommentLine(line) || acc.inBlock
acc.flags.add(shouldInclude)
val nextInCommentBlock = determineCommentBlockState(trimmed, acc.inBlock)
acc.copy(flags = acc.flags, inBlock = nextInCommentBlock)
Copy link

Copilot AI Sep 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using MutableList in an immutable data class creates inconsistent mutability patterns. Consider using an immutable List and functional accumulation approach instead."

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

// Second pass: build output with separators between non-contiguous regions
// Accumulates second-pass output and the index of the last included source line
data class OutputAcc(val result: MutableList<String>, val lastIdx: Int)
Copy link

Copilot AI Sep 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using MutableList in an immutable data class creates inconsistent mutability patterns. Consider using an immutable List and functional accumulation approach instead."

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@eschizoid eschizoid merged commit 72105ff into main Sep 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@eschizoid eschizoid deleted the feature/server-enhancements branch September 3, 2025 20:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants