Skip to content

Comments

chore: add claude skill for reviewing docs#16137

Merged
shellmayr merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
shellmayr/chore/add-claude-skill-for-reviewing-docs
Jan 27, 2026
Merged

chore: add claude skill for reviewing docs#16137
shellmayr merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
shellmayr/chore/add-claude-skill-for-reviewing-docs

Conversation

@shellmayr
Copy link
Member

  • This adds a skill that enables claude to review docs PRs for style & language using specific guidelines
  • We tried this out and found that it was very correct in what it suggested, may be useful for conducting a local self-review before having other developers read through documentation

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 23, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
develop-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 23, 2026 1:29pm
sentry-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 23, 2026 1:29pm

Request Review

@dingsdax
Copy link
Contributor

@shellmayr I found a related skill that’s an interesting application for ensuring a specific reading skill level: https://github.com/nateberkopec/dotfiles/blob/fa30f09f01fc50e6a49fd3db9a8e7626e440c2c1/files/home/.claude/skills/readme-writer/SKILL.md.

@shellmayr
Copy link
Member Author

@dingsdax that's also interesting! I guess we could also ask it to measure flesch score and optimize towards that, but I honestly wouldn't go that far. I've tried some of that in the past, and it's a bit of a rabbit hole to try to optimize for reading levels, especially because the models definitely don't one-shot that

@shellmayr shellmayr merged commit 0170f0b into master Jan 27, 2026
14 checks passed
@shellmayr shellmayr deleted the shellmayr/chore/add-claude-skill-for-reviewing-docs branch January 27, 2026 14:06
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 12, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants