BE-489, H-6417, H-6418: Kratos session refresh, passwordless password setup, Playwright overhaul

[TimDiekmann]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Three related auth improvements plus a comprehensive Playwright test suite overhaul that grew out of the H-6219 TOTP restoration work:

1. Kratos session refresh (H-6417) — security-sensitive settings changes (disable TOTP, change password) now rely on Kratos's privileged_session_max_age for re-authentication instead of a custom current-password prompt.
2. Passwordless password setup (BE-489, H-6418) — SSO-only users who never set a password can now do so from the security settings page; the old flow required re-entering a current password they didn't have.
3. Playwright test suite overhaul — reorganised into project groups, stabilised browser-extension tests, added browser matrix config, hardened error handling across frontend and plugin codebases.

🔗 Related links

• BE-489 — Allow setting a password when none exists
• H-6417 — Session refresh for security-sensitive settings changes
• H-6418 — Password setup UI for SSO-only users
• H-6219 — Fix and restore TOTP MFA settings (merged in H-6219: Restore TOTP MFA and fix AAL2 login redirect #8622)
• FE-594 — Fix TSC error in pdf-preview (merged in FE-594: Fix PDFDocumentProxy type mismatch in pdf-preview #8636)

🚫 Blocked by

Nothing.

🔍 What does this change?

Test suite reorganisation (ac943f87cd)

• Split flat spec files into four project groups: account/ (signup, signin, password, MFA), features/ (pre-authenticated via storageState), guest/, and extension/.
• globalSetup signs Alice in once and persists her session.
• Dedicated test users per auth-mutating test via shared/test-users.ts + shared/delete-user.ts.
• Browser matrix config: flows × browsers with chromium/firefox/webkit. test:integration defaults to *-chromium; firefox/webkit available via dedicated scripts.

Browser-extension test stabilisation (7f900e3c6f)

• waitForPopupStateLoaded — 500 ms idle window on chrome.storage.onChanged so mount-time fetches settle before interaction.
• resetOneOffState / resetAutomatedState — direct chrome.storage.local.set writes instead of per-chip UI clicks (avoids debounce races with late getUser writes).
• openPopupTab — pins popupTab in storage before clicking tab to prevent late getUser from flipping it back.
• selectEntityTypeOption — ArrowDown + Enter with chip-count assertion.
• Plugin cookie guard: infer-entities.ts no longer opens a doomed WebSocket when no session cookies exist.

Apollo SSR fix (47d53ffa15)

• Disable queryDeduplication on the server-side Apollo client singleton; the dedup key ignores context (auth cookies) so concurrent SSR requests for the same query would share one response.

TOTP disable consolidation (1bc1fdba6c)

• Extract executeDisableTotp (unlink TOTP + clear backup codes). Drop currentPassword / isRecoveryFlow state — Kratos enforces privileged session age via privileged_session_max_age.

Review findings cleanup (fb72744484)

• Delete dead helpers: loginUsingTempForm, loginUsingUi, getDerivedPayloadFromMostRecentEmail.
• signOut → clearSessionCookies.
• submitSettingsUpdate catches all errors instead of re-rejecting.
• gatherUiNodeValuesFromFlow / useKratosErrorHandler generics tightened.
• flowMetadata.settingsWithPassword derived from settings.
• callGraphQlApi checks HTTP status + GraphQL errors.
• waitForConnection timeout + CLOSED/CLOSING check.
• WebSocket JSON.parse wrapped, error handler logs event, getCookieString rejection caught.
• decodeBase32 throws on invalid characters.
• global-setup try/finally.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

⚠️ Known issues

• Extension tests depend on a 500 ms storage-idle heuristic (waitForPopupStateLoaded) because the popup fires multiple uncoordinated async fetches on mount. Stable in 10/10 consecutive runs locally but the heuristic is not a guarantee under CI load.
• Multi-browser matrix (firefox/webkit) is configured but account tests will race on shared user identities if run in parallel. Serial execution or per-browser identity suffixes needed for cross-browser CI.

🐾 Next steps

• Add pdfjs-dist as explicit frontend dependency (FE-595)
• Enable import/no-extraneous-dependencies globally in eslint base config (FE-596)
• FE-598 — Consolidate security.page.tsx 14× useState into useReducer
• Consider React Query / SWR for the browser plugin's mount-time state coordination

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Full Playwright suite: 29 active tests across 4 projects, 5 skipped (pre-existing).
• 10/10 consecutive green runs locally.

❓ How to test this?

1. yarn start:test
2. cd tests/hash-playwright && npx playwright test --project '*-chromium'
3. Confirm all 29 tests pass.
4. Optionally: npx playwright test --project '*-firefox' (requires npx playwright install firefox)

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 17, 2026 11:30am

3 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign	Ignored	Preview	Apr 17, 2026 11:30am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Apr 17, 2026 11:30am
petrinaut	Skipped	Comment	Apr 17, 2026 11:30am

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 62.49%. Comparing base (efbcf7c) to head (c9d3fa1).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../hash-isomorphic-utils/src/create-apollo-client.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8638      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.49%   62.49%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1318     1318              
  Lines      134234   134235       +1     
  Branches     5520     5521       +1     
==========================================
  Hits        83893    83893              
- Misses      49426    49427       +1     
  Partials      915      915              

Flag	Coverage Δ
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing t/be-489-allow-setting-a-password-when-none-exists (dc4c82e) with main (d8d0ed3)}

[cursor]

PR Summary

High Risk
Touches security-sensitive authentication/settings flows (password change, TOTP disable) and Kratos session-refresh handling, plus an SSR data-isolation fix; mistakes here could cause account lockouts or cross-user data exposure.

Overview
Security settings now rely on Kratos’ privileged_session_max_age for re-authentication instead of a frontend “current password” step, enabling password setup/changes for SSO-only users and consolidating TOTP disable into a 2-step unlink + backup-code clear sequence with improved error surfacing.

Server-side Apollo is hardened by disabling query deduplication for SSR to prevent cross-request auth cookie leakage, and Kratos flow utilities/error handling are tightened (safer redirect parsing/logging, stronger TypeScript typing).

Playwright is restructured into flow-based projects with global auth state seeding, dedicated test users, expanded account coverage (signin/signout/password/recovery/MFA), and more robust extension tests; additional stability fixes land in the browser plugin WebSocket logic (cookie guarding, timeouts, parse/error handling).

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit dc4c82e. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR updates HASH’s authentication flows and test infrastructure to better rely on Ory Kratos for re-authentication and to improve integration test stability.

Changes:

• Switch security-sensitive settings (password change, TOTP disable) to depend on Kratos privileged_session_max_age rather than a custom “current password” prompt.
• Enable password setup/change flows for users who previously didn’t have a password (e.g. SSO-only users).
• Consolidate TOTP disable into a two-step sequence that also disables backup codes to avoid orphaned AAL2 state.
• Add SELFSERVICE_FLOWS_SETTINGS_PRIVILEGED_SESSION_MAX_AGE to local Kratos docker-compose config.
• Prevent cross-user SSR data leakage by disabling Apollo query deduplication on the server-side singleton client.
• Tighten Kratos flow typing/metadata helpers and improve redirect parsing diagnostics.
• Harden browser extension WebSocket behavior (cookie guarding, connection timeouts, safer message parsing, less noisy polling).
• Overhaul Playwright suite layout (flow-based projects, browser matrix config, global setup with stored auth state, dedicated per-test users, improved extension fixtures).

Technical Notes: Several new flows depend on Kratos returning session_refresh_required and the shared error handler performing a browser redirect to re-authenticate.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 2 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit dc4c82e. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.809 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 455 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.498 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.052 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.112 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.048 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.745 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.968 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.757 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.024 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.099 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.468 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.441 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.939 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.459 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.860 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.212 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$53.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.938 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.327 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$48.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.904 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.42 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}27.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$61.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$60.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$55.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 490 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.593 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 527 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.803 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$290 \mathrm{ms} \pm 927 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.906 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.979 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$18.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 128 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.000 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 240 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$34.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.950 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$36.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$34.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.467 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.497 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$94.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 662 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$150 \mathrm{ms} \pm 862 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$99.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 483 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 459 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.515 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 584 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.694 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 470 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 598 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.523 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 586 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 495 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$178 \mathrm{ms} \pm 740 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$168 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.45 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}11.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$552 \mathrm{ms} \pm 917 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph