Update tool cargo:clippy-sarif to 0.8.0

[hash-worker]

Requested by Tim Diekmann · Slack thread
This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Update	Change
cargo:clippy-sarif (source)	minor	0.6.5 → 0.8.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

psastras/sarif-rs (cargo:clippy-sarif)

v0.8.0: clippy-sarif 0.8.0

Compare Source

Changelog

[clippy-sarif-v0.8.0] - 2025-05-09

🚀 Features

• Add feature flag to enable fallback setters for builder
• (serde-sarif) Add miri converter
• Add miri-sarif

🐛 Bug Fixes

• Use check name for ruleId
• Compile clang-tidy regex once

⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks

• Bump thiserror from 2.0.7 to 2.0.8
• Bump thiserror from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9
• Bump syn from 2.0.90 to 2.0.91
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.94 to 1.0.95
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.133 to 1.0.134
• Bump quote from 1.0.37 to 1.0.38
• Bump syn from 2.0.91 to 2.0.92
• Bump syn from 2.0.92 to 2.0.93
• Bump serde from 1.0.216 to 1.0.217
• Bump syn from 2.0.93 to 2.0.94
• Bump syn from 2.0.94 to 2.0.95
• Bump prettyplease from 0.2.25 to 0.2.27
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.134 to 1.0.135
• Bump clap from 4.5.23 to 4.5.24
• Bump clap from 4.5.24 to 4.5.26
• Bump thiserror from 2.0.9 to 2.0.10
• Bump syn from 2.0.95 to 2.0.96
• Bump thiserror from 2.0.10 to 2.0.11
• Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.92 to 1.0.93
• Bump prettyplease from 0.2.27 to 0.2.29
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.135 to 1.0.137
• Bump DeterminateSystems/magic-nix-cache-action from 8 to 9
• Bump clap from 4.5.26 to 4.5.27
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.137 to 1.0.138
• Bump syn from 2.0.96 to 2.0.98
• Bump clap from 4.5.27 to 4.5.28
• Bump strum from 0.26.3 to 0.27.0
• Bump strum_macros from 0.26.4 to 0.27.0
• Bump clap from 4.5.28 to 4.5.29
• Bump strum_macros from 0.27.0 to 0.27.1
• Bump clap from 4.5.29 to 4.5.30
• Bump strum from 0.27.0 to 0.27.1
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.138 to 1.0.139
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.95 to 1.0.96
• Bump serde from 1.0.217 to 1.0.218
• Bump ossf/scorecard-action from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1
• Bump clap from 4.5.30 to 4.5.31
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.96 to 1.0.97
• Bump thiserror from 2.0.11 to 2.0.12
• Bump quote from 1.0.38 to 1.0.39
• Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.93 to 1.0.94
• Bump syn from 2.0.98 to 2.0.99
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.139 to 1.0.140
• Bump prettyplease from 0.2.29 to 0.2.30
• Bump cargo_metadata from 0.19.1 to 0.19.2
• Bump serde from 1.0.218 to 1.0.219
• Bump syn from 2.0.99 to 2.0.100
• Bump clap from 4.5.31 to 4.5.32
• Bump quote from 1.0.39 to 1.0.40
• Bump prettyplease from 0.2.30 to 0.2.31
• Bump typed-builder from 0.20.0 to 0.20.1
• Bump typed-builder from 0.20.1 to 0.21.0
• Bump codespan-reporting from 0.11.1 to 0.12.0
• Bump clap from 4.5.32 to 4.5.33
• Bump clap from 4.5.33 to 4.5.34
• Bump clap from 4.5.34 to 4.5.35
• Bump prettyplease from 0.2.31 to 0.2.32
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.97 to 1.0.98
• Bump clap from 4.5.35 to 4.5.36
• Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.94 to 1.0.95
• Bump clap from 4.5.36 to 4.5.37
• Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 16 to 17
• Bump syn from 2.0.100 to 2.0.101
• Bump duct from 0.13.7 to 1.0.0
• Bump duct_sh from 0.13.7 to 1.0.0

v0.7.0: clippy-sarif 0.7.0

Compare Source

Changelog

[clippy-sarif-v0.7.0] - 2024-12-18

🐛 Bug Fixes

• Bare enums serialize with their tags

⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks

• Bump syn from 2.0.76 to 2.0.77
• Bump clap from 4.5.16 to 4.5.17
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.127 to 1.0.128
• Bump serde from 1.0.209 to 1.0.210
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.86 to 1.0.87
• Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 13 to 14
• Bump DeterminateSystems/magic-nix-cache-action from 7 to 8
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.87 to 1.0.88
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.88 to 1.0.89
• Bump thiserror from 1.0.63 to 1.0.64
• Bump clap from 4.5.17 to 4.5.18
• Bump syn from 2.0.77 to 2.0.79
• Bump regex from 1.10.6 to 1.11.0
• Bump clap from 4.5.18 to 4.5.19
• Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.86 to 1.0.87
• Bump clap from 4.5.19 to 4.5.20
• Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.87 to 1.0.88
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.128 to 1.0.129
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.89 to 1.0.90
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.129 to 1.0.130
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.130 to 1.0.132
• Bump prettyplease from 0.2.22 to 0.2.24
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.90 to 1.0.91
• Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.88 to 1.0.89
• Bump thiserror from 1.0.64 to 1.0.65
• Bump serde from 1.0.210 to 1.0.213
• Bump syn from 2.0.82 to 2.0.83
• Bump syn from 2.0.83 to 2.0.85
• Bump prettyplease from 0.2.24 to 0.2.25
• Bump regex from 1.11.0 to 1.11.1
• Bump serde from 1.0.213 to 1.0.214
• Bump thiserror from 1.0.65 to 1.0.66
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.91 to 1.0.92
• Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 14 to 15
• Bump syn from 2.0.86 to 2.0.87
• Bump thiserror from 1.0.66 to 1.0.68
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.92 to 1.0.93
• Bump thiserror from 1.0.68 to 2.0.0
• Bump thiserror from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1
• Bump thiserror from 2.0.1 to 2.0.3
• Bump serde from 1.0.214 to 1.0.215
• Bump clap from 4.5.20 to 4.5.21
• Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 15 to 16
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.132 to 1.0.133
• Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.89 to 1.0.91
• Bump cargo_metadata from 0.18.1 to 0.19.0
• Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.91 to 1.0.92
• Bump syn from 2.0.87 to 2.0.89
• Bump syn from 2.0.89 to 2.0.90
• Bump anyhow from 1.0.93 to 1.0.94
• Bump cargo_metadata from 0.19.0 to 0.19.1
• Bump thiserror from 2.0.3 to 2.0.4
• Bump clap from 4.5.21 to 4.5.22
• Bump clap from 4.5.22 to 4.5.23
• Bump thiserror from 2.0.4 to 2.0.6
• Bump serde from 1.0.215 to 1.0.216
• Bump thiserror from 2.0.6 to 2.0.7

v0.6.6: clippy-sarif 0.6.6

Compare Source

Changelog

[clippy-sarif-v0.6.6] - 2024-09-02

📚 Documentation

• Fix documentation link
• Amend install instructions

⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks

• Bump clap from 4.5.13 to 4.5.14
• Bump serde from 1.0.204 to 1.0.205
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.122 to 1.0.124
• Bump clap from 4.5.14 to 4.5.15
• Bump serde from 1.0.205 to 1.0.206
• Bump syn from 2.0.72 to 2.0.74
• Bump serde from 1.0.206 to 1.0.207
• Bump serde from 1.0.207 to 1.0.208
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.124 to 1.0.125
• Bump clap from 4.5.15 to 4.5.16
• Bump syn from 2.0.74 to 2.0.75
• Bump typed-builder from 0.19.1 to 0.20.0
• Bump quote from 1.0.36 to 1.0.37
• Bump serde from 1.0.208 to 1.0.209
• Bump serde_json from 1.0.125 to 1.0.127
• Bump syn from 2.0.75 to 2.0.76
• Bump prettyplease from 0.2.20 to 0.2.22

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 9, 2026 11:02am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 9, 2026 11:02am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 9, 2026 11:02am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single dependency version bump in CI tooling with no application or workflow logic changes in the diff.

Overview
Bumps the mise CI tool pin for cargo:clippy-sarif from 0.6.5 to 0.8.0 in .config/mise/config.ci.toml, aligning it with the already-pinned cargo:sarif-fmt at 0.8.0.

This is a version-only change; CI still pipes Clippy JSON through clippy-sarif in the lint workflow. Upstream 0.8.0 includes fixes such as using the check name for ruleId and compiling the clang-tidy regex once, plus new SARIF-related tooling in the same release line.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 33d54e5. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the CI-pinned cargo:clippy-sarif tool version.
Changes: Bumps cargo:clippy-sarif from 0.6.5 to 0.8.0 in .config/mise/config.ci.toml to keep clippy SARIF generation up to date.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.51%. Comparing base (186b284) to head (33d54e5).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8734      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.20%   59.51%   +0.31%     
==========================================
  Files        1358     1371      +13     
  Lines      132674   135250    +2576     
  Branches     6019     6137     +118     
==========================================
+ Hits        78546    80493    +1947     
- Misses      53198    53826     +628     
- Partials      930      931       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	6.39% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.21% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	7.41% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	91.88% <ø> (?)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	29.02% <ø> (-0.09%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-store	38.20% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	89.63% <ø> (+2.39%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	78.95% <ø> (-0.47%)	⬇️
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.51% <ø> (+0.19%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-eval	79.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.09% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-mir	88.05% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/tool/cargo-clippy-sarif-0.x (33d54e5) with main (98504ed)}

[hash-worker]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.600 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.367 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.597 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$23.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.884 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.054 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.116 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.519 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.146 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.317 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.625 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.010 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.899 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.650 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.679 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.810 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.115 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.029 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.420 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$41.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.249 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$40.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.845 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$48.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$39.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$84.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 619 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$277 \mathrm{ms} \pm 978 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.003 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.618 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.468 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.039 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.263 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.847 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.660 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.441 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 570 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 674 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$62.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$81.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 503 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 483 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$44.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 436 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$74.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$51.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 473 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 435 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 731 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 675 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$18.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$511 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.28 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.892 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph