-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 768
Update system-requirements.md #10631
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
grootjans
wants to merge
1
commit into
development
Choose a base branch
from
maia-model-support-pmp
base: development
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems to conflate two different things. Maia and LLMs in Mendix apps. It implies you can use all these models with Maia - but I don't think that is under user control?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you expand on 'LLMs in Mendix apps', it would refer to LLMs that Studio Pro can work with, and not LLMs in apps, but perhaps I'm misinterpetting your feedback.
As for user control, as mentioned in the PR comment, is only there in Private Platform, the model is supplied to you on the public platform. We could think of making that part more explicit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, so you do mean that you can use these for Maia - then I think we need to be very clear that this is not a choice for most customers, only for PMP.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this belongs in System Requirements at all. It is not a system requirement for running Studio Pro for the vast majority of people - most people will not need to install an LLM or decide which LLM Maia should be using.
The only requirement about LLMs for Maia is that they not be blocked by a firewall and this is mentioned here: http://docs.mendix.com/refguide/mendix-ai-assistance/#maia-network-requirement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fact that we impose an LLM for our public platform is a limitation in technical capabilities, that will likely change. Not documenting this due to a limit of choice also does not seem like the right direction.
It is also not a PMP feature, it is a SP+Maia capability. Regardless, I fully agree that the current request needs to be updated to clearly reflect the current state before it can be released, that is on my todo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't agree that it is a limitation. It is a design.
In the same way we don't have to tell customers that some UX features use ETO and other use Web components. Or that we use particular libraries when coding C#. It's just the way they are written.
Customers don't have a choice about which UX management tool they use to see the UX. In the same way, they don't have any choice about which LLM Maia uses, what resources we use to train Maia, or how much weight we give different resources in helping Maia reach the right answer. If we find in future that a different LLM model produces better results for Maia, then we should be able to change that at the back end, in the same way as we move from ETO to Web.
This is, of course, different from deciding which LLM you will implement when using genai resources in your app.
It may also be different when it comes to having to choose and pay for your own LLM when running Maia on PMP.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Per the PMP team, BYO Maya will be available for PMP 2.6 and newer.)
@grootjans we have a PMP requirements page - what do you think about putting the information there for the time being? Once this capability is enabled for the public platform, we can add the info there and only refer to it from the PMP page (in the same manner as the System Requirements link here) but while it only applies to PMP, I'd keep it within the PMP scope.