Closed
Conversation
Generated-By: mintlify-agent
Contributor
Author
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Extends the existing
redeploypattern inaccept.txtto also coverredeploymentandredeployments, which appear in the newly added preview deployment API docs.Note
Low Risk
Low risk: a small docs-lint configuration tweak that only affects Vale spell/term checking and does not impact runtime code paths.
Overview
Updates the Vale Mintlify accepted vocabulary to treat
redeployment/redeploymentsas valid by extending the existingredeployregex inaccept.txt, reducing false-positive lint warnings in docs.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9b9f61b. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.