Skip to content

Conversation

@AaronRM
Copy link
Contributor

@AaronRM AaronRM commented Dec 5, 2025

This pull request introduces an implementation of the Quiver write-ahead log (WAL). The most significant change from the initial spec includes a rewrite and clarification of the WAL file rotation and checkpointing mechanism. Documentation has been updated to reflect the new design.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the rust Pull requests that update Rust code label Dec 5, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.69247% with 94 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.74%. Comparing base (90148f9) to head (d6096d2).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1537      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.48%   83.74%   +0.26%     
==========================================
  Files         428      433       +5     
  Lines      118652   121877    +3225     
==========================================
+ Hits        99054   102068    +3014     
- Misses      19064    19275     +211     
  Partials      534      534              
Components Coverage Δ
otap-dataflow 85.08% <96.69%> (+0.36%) ⬆️
query_abstraction 80.61% <ø> (ø)
query_engine 90.26% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
syslog_cef_receivers ∅ <ø> (∅)
otel-arrow-go 53.50% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

"MIT-0",
"Apache-2.0",
"Unicode-3.0",
"BSD-2-Clause",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Required due to the array-ref transitive dependency (from blake3) using this license. BSD-2-Clause is even more permissive than BSD-3-Clause (which is already allowed here), so I don't believe this should be a concern.

@AaronRM AaronRM marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2025 22:57
@AaronRM AaronRM requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2025 22:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rust Pull requests that update Rust code

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant