Skip to content

Mention security analysis in 1.0 and 1.1#712

Open
dpostnikov wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
dpostnikov-patch-2
Open

Mention security analysis in 1.0 and 1.1#712
dpostnikov wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
dpostnikov-patch-2

Conversation

@dpostnikov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@dpostnikov dpostnikov commented Mar 25, 2026

Re-applying to 1.0 and applyin to 1.1.

closes #645

Applying PR694 1.0 changes to 1.1
@dpostnikov dpostnikov changed the title Mention security analysis in 1.1 Mention security analysis in 1.0 and 1.1 Mar 25, 2026
@dpostnikov dpostnikov requested review from Sakurann and jogu March 25, 2026 01:30
Comment thread 1.0/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0.md Outdated
@javereec javereec self-requested a review April 2, 2026 14:41
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@javereec javereec left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apart from suggestion made by @fkj on using DOI reference when possible, it looks good.

Co-authored-by: Kristina <52878547+Sakurann@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread 1.0/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0.md Outdated
Comment thread 1.1/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_1.md Outdated
dpostnikov and others added 2 commits April 28, 2026 03:17
Co-authored-by: Frederik Krogsdal Jacobsen <fkj@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Frederik Krogsdal Jacobsen <fkj@users.noreply.github.com>
@dpostnikov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Discussed today, minor fixes applied. Ready to merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Mention security analysis?

6 participants