Skip to content

OCPBUGS-87353: Updating openshift-enterprise-console-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0#16558

Open
openshift-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
openshift-bot:art-consistency-openshift-5.0-openshift-enterprise-console
Open

OCPBUGS-87353: Updating openshift-enterprise-console-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0#16558
openshift-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
openshift-bot:art-consistency-openshift-5.0-openshift-enterprise-console

Conversation

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-bot openshift-bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Updating openshift-enterprise-console-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
openshift-enterprise-console.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot force-pushed the art-consistency-openshift-5.0-openshift-enterprise-console branch from 8a53441 to ed1a600 Compare June 6, 2026 13:39
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Walkthrough

The Dockerfile updates three multi-stage builder and runtime image references to OpenShift 5.0 platform releases: the Go 1.26 builder stage, the Node.js builder stage, and the final runtime base image.

Changes

OpenShift 5.0 platform migration

Layer / File(s) Summary
OpenShift 5.0 builder and runtime stages
Dockerfile
Go builder stage switches to rhel-9-golang-1.26 on OpenShift 5.0; Node.js builder stage updates to OpenShift 5.0 variant; runtime stage base image updated to registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/5.0:base-rhel9.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description does not follow the required template structure with sections like Analysis/Root cause, Solution description, Test cases, and Browser conformance. Fill out the required PR description template sections including Analysis/Root cause, Solution description, Test setup, Test cases, and Browser conformance checklist to align with repository standards.
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed PR modifies only Dockerfile and Go config files; no Ginkgo test files are changed. All test files in the PR use standard Go testing (testing.T), not Ginkgo.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed PR only modifies Dockerfile base image references; contains no Ginkgo test code changes. Custom check for test quality is not applicable.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed This PR only updates Dockerfile image references; it contains no new Ginkgo e2e tests, so the MicroShift test compatibility check does not apply.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only modifies Dockerfile base image references; no Ginkgo e2e tests are added, so SNO test compatibility check is not applicable.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only updates Docker base image references in Dockerfile. No deployment manifests, operator code, controllers, or scheduling constraints are added or modified.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed PR only modifies Dockerfile base image references (OpenShift 5.0 image updates). No changes to Go code, test code, or process-level logging that could violate OTE stdout contracts.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed This PR only updates Dockerfile image references for OpenShift 5.0; no Ginkgo e2e tests or test files are added, so the IPv6/disconnected network compatibility check does not apply.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR updates Dockerfile base images only; no cryptographic code changes. Pre-existing MD5 in catalog_service.go and proper constant-time CSRF comparison found.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed The Dockerfile contains no privileged: true, hostPID/Network/IPC, SYS_ADMIN, allowPrivilegeEscalation: true, or unnecessary root execution in the final image (runs as user 1001).
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed No logging statements expose secrets, tokens, API keys, PII, session IDs, hostnames, or customer data. Dockerfile contains only config updates to base image references.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: updating OpenShift container images for consistency with ART for version 5.0.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from rhamilto and spadgett June 6, 2026 13:40
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign rhamilto for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot openshift-bot changed the title Updating openshift-enterprise-console-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0 OCPBUGS-87353: Updating openshift-enterprise-console-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0 Jun 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87353, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Updating openshift-enterprise-console-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
openshift-enterprise-console.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87353, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Details

In response to this:

Updating openshift-enterprise-console-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
openshift-enterprise-console.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
  • Updated application container images and build environment to latest platform versions, enhancing system stability, security, and runtime performance.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@Dockerfile`:
- Line 4: Replace any FROM lines that reference registry.ci.openshift.org with
the approved catalog.redhat.com UBI minimal or distroless images that provide
the same toolchain/runtime (e.g., use a catalog.redhat.com UBI image that
matches golang 1.26 for the gobuilder stage). Update the three build stage bases
(the gobuilder stage and the two other FROM stages introduced at lines 13 and
26) to use equivalent catalog.redhat.com UBI minimal or distroless images while
keeping the same functionality and tool versions; ensure stage names like
"gobuilder" remain unchanged and that any downstream steps still work with the
new base images.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: b62c861c-a051-427d-bfe7-d79d8f033726

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec1ce9a and ed1a600.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile

Comment thread Dockerfile
#
# go backend build
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/builder:rhel-9-golang-1.25-openshift-4.22 AS gobuilder
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/builder:rhel-9-golang-1.26-openshift-5.0 AS gobuilder
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Use approved Red Hat base image source for all modified stages.

At Dockerfile Line 4, Line 13, and Line 26, the updated FROM images use registry.ci.openshift.org/..., but the container policy requires base images from catalog.redhat.com (UBI minimal or distroless). Please switch these stage bases to approved catalog-backed images while keeping the same functional toolchain/runtime targets.

As per coding guidelines, "Base image: UBI minimal or distroless from catalog.redhat.com".

Also applies to: 13-13, 26-26

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@Dockerfile` at line 4, Replace any FROM lines that reference
registry.ci.openshift.org with the approved catalog.redhat.com UBI minimal or
distroless images that provide the same toolchain/runtime (e.g., use a
catalog.redhat.com UBI image that matches golang 1.26 for the gobuilder stage).
Update the three build stage bases (the gobuilder stage and the two other FROM
stages introduced at lines 13 and 26) to use equivalent catalog.redhat.com UBI
minimal or distroless images while keeping the same functionality and tool
versions; ensure stage names like "gobuilder" remain unchanged and that any
downstream steps still work with the new base images.

Source: Coding guidelines

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

@openshift-bot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-playwright ed1a600 link false /test e2e-playwright

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants