forked from mlichvar/chrony
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
SRV records #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
squell
wants to merge
11
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
srvrecord
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
SRV records #2
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0950b93
dns: Introduce separate type for a DNS name lookup result.
davidv1992 d8667cd
nts: Update nts server name from DNS lookup results.
davidv1992 b223688
dns: Add parameter to DNS lookups to indicate whether its for NTS.
davidv1992 0f0d69a
dns: Implement SRV record indirection for NTSKE lookups.
davidv1992 a0ea1fd
dns: Trim trailing dot from resolved SRV domain name.
davidv1992 c24d0c1
dns: Use SRV record port.
davidv1992 527cfc6
rename ip->ip_addr in DNS_SockAddrLookupResult
squell d52c0d4
formatting style
squell 39bf9db
rename service_nts
squell d4c791e
Fixup unit tests for ip->ipaddr rename.
davidv1992 d22573f
Split off srv lookups into their own function.
davidv1992 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't need changing per se, but wondering why we wouldn't simply offer just one
--without/--disableflag. If you disable SRV, you don't need getdns right? And without getdns, you can't do SRV lookups. So isn't this a bit superfluous?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Chose this approach as it matches the current way configure works for chrony. Figured consistency in the ux, even though it results in superfluous options, is better than inconsistency.