Skip to content

Don't store pattern_ty in TestableCase#154879

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Zalathar:pattern-ty
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

Don't store pattern_ty in TestableCase#154879
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Zalathar:pattern-ty

Conversation

@Zalathar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Zalathar Zalathar commented Apr 6, 2026

This field's only remaining use was in an assertion, but we can perform the same assertion earlier when constructing TestableCase::Range.


For background, the pattern_ty field was introduced in #136435 to replace a reference to the full THIR pattern node. Since then, most uses of pattern_ty were removed by #150238.

This field's only remaining use was in an assertion, but we can perform the
same assertion earlier when constructing `TestableCase::Range`.
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 6, 2026

Some changes occurred in match lowering

cc @Nadrieril

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 6, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 6, 2026

r? @jdonszelmann

rustbot has assigned @jdonszelmann.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: compiler, mir
  • compiler, mir expanded to 69 candidates
  • Random selection from 12 candidates

@Nadrieril
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Nice, good spot.

r? me

@bors r+ rollup

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 8, 2026

📌 Commit f9430bb has been approved by Nadrieril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 8, 2026
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
Don't store `pattern_ty` in `TestableCase`

This field's only remaining use was in an assertion, but we can perform the same assertion earlier when constructing `TestableCase::Range`.

---

For background, the `pattern_ty` field was introduced in rust-lang#136435 to replace a reference to the full THIR pattern node. Since then, most uses of `pattern_ty` were removed by rust-lang#150238.
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
…uwer

Rollup of 15 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #153995 (Use convergent attribute to funcs for GPU targets)
 - #154184 (stabilize s390x vector registers)
 - #151898 (constify DoubleEndedIterator)
 - #154235 (remove unnecessary variables and delimiter check)
 - #154473 (move borrow checker tests)
 - #154745 (Replace span_look_ahead with span_followed_by)
 - #154778 (make field representing types invariant over the base type)
 - #154867 (Fix private fields diagnostics and improve error messages)
 - #154879 (Don't store `pattern_ty` in `TestableCase`)
 - #154910 (Suppress `unreachable_code` lint in `derive(PartialEq, Clone)`)
 - #154923 (Fix ICE in next-solver dyn-compatibility check)
 - #154934 (Add getters for `rustc_pattern_analysis::constructor::Slice` fields)
 - #154938 (match exhaustiveness: Show the guard exhaustivity note only when it's the guards alone that cause non-exhaustiveness)
 - #154961 (Use derived impl for `GappedRange` subdiagnostic)
 - #154980 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
@rust-bors rust-bors bot merged commit 03cf715 into rust-lang:main Apr 8, 2026
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
Rollup merge of #154879 - Zalathar:pattern-ty, r=Nadrieril

Don't store `pattern_ty` in `TestableCase`

This field's only remaining use was in an assertion, but we can perform the same assertion earlier when constructing `TestableCase::Range`.

---

For background, the `pattern_ty` field was introduced in #136435 to replace a reference to the full THIR pattern node. Since then, most uses of `pattern_ty` were removed by #150238.
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the pattern-ty branch April 8, 2026 23:39
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2026
…uwer

Rollup of 15 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#153995 (Use convergent attribute to funcs for GPU targets)
 - rust-lang/rust#154184 (stabilize s390x vector registers)
 - rust-lang/rust#151898 (constify DoubleEndedIterator)
 - rust-lang/rust#154235 (remove unnecessary variables and delimiter check)
 - rust-lang/rust#154473 (move borrow checker tests)
 - rust-lang/rust#154745 (Replace span_look_ahead with span_followed_by)
 - rust-lang/rust#154778 (make field representing types invariant over the base type)
 - rust-lang/rust#154867 (Fix private fields diagnostics and improve error messages)
 - rust-lang/rust#154879 (Don't store `pattern_ty` in `TestableCase`)
 - rust-lang/rust#154910 (Suppress `unreachable_code` lint in `derive(PartialEq, Clone)`)
 - rust-lang/rust#154923 (Fix ICE in next-solver dyn-compatibility check)
 - rust-lang/rust#154934 (Add getters for `rustc_pattern_analysis::constructor::Slice` fields)
 - rust-lang/rust#154938 (match exhaustiveness: Show the guard exhaustivity note only when it's the guards alone that cause non-exhaustiveness)
 - rust-lang/rust#154961 (Use derived impl for `GappedRange` subdiagnostic)
 - rust-lang/rust#154980 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants