-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 638
Add bin/setup for unified development environment setup #2191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This adds a top-level setup script that installs all dependencies across the monorepo with a single command, making it easier for new contributors to get started. The script: - Checks for required tools (pnpm, bundler, node, ruby) - Installs root pnpm and bundle dependencies - Builds the node package via rake node_package - Sets up react_on_rails/spec/dummy - Sets up react_on_rails_pro and its dummy apps (if present) - Provides clear progress output and helpful error messages Fixes #2190 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@justin808 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Code ReviewThanks for this contribution! This is a useful addition that will improve the onboarding experience for new contributors. Here's my review: ✅ Strengths
🔍 Potential Issues & Suggestions1. Missing RuboCop Check (CRITICAL per CLAUDE.md)Per the project's CLAUDE.md requirements:
Please run: bundle exec rubocop bin/setupIf there are any violations, fix them before merging. 2. Potential Shellcheck IssuesConsider running shellcheck on the script to catch any potential issues: shellcheck bin/setupCommon issues to watch for:
3. Error Handling for
|
Code ReviewGreat work on adding a unified setup script! This will significantly improve the developer onboarding experience. Here's my detailed feedback: ✅ Strengths
🔍 Code Quality IssuesCritical: Error Handling for
|
Code Review for PR #2191: Add bin/setup for unified development environment setup✅ Overall AssessmentThis is a well-implemented enhancement that addresses a real developer pain point. The script follows bash best practices and provides a great DX improvement. I have a few suggestions for improvement below. 🎯 Strengths
🔍 Issues & Suggestions1. Path Inconsistency - Potentially CriticalIssue: The script installs dependencies for install_dependencies "$ROOT_DIR/react_on_rails/spec/dummy" "react_on_rails/spec/dummy"But based on the directory structure, the path should be Evidence: The existing dummy app setup script is at Impact: This will cause the script to skip dummy app setup with a warning, which defeats part of its purpose. Fix: Update line 160 to: install_dependencies "$ROOT_DIR/spec/dummy" "spec/dummy"And similarly for Pro paths if they follow the same pattern. 2. Missing CONTRIBUTING.md Path UpdateIssue: CONTRIBUTING.md line 32 still references: cd react_on_rails/
bundle && pnpm install && rake shakapacker_examples:gen_all && rake node_package && rakeThis bundle && pnpm install && rake shakapacker_examples:gen_all && rake node_package && rakeFix: Remove the 3. Test Coverage MissingIssue: The PR checklist shows:
Per CLAUDE.md guidelines:
While this is a new feature (not a fix), the same principle applies: infrastructure scripts MUST be tested manually. Recommendation:
4. Minor: Inconsistent Naming ConventionIssue: The script checks for The first is Verification needed: Confirm the actual directory structure matches the script's assumptions. 🔒 Security Review✅ No security concerns identified:
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsMinor optimization opportunity: The if pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --offline &> /dev/null; then
print_success "JavaScript dependencies already satisfied"
else
pnpm install
print_success "JavaScript dependencies installed"
fiThis would make subsequent runs faster (though not critical). 📝 DocumentationSuggestion: Consider adding a note about what to do if the script fails midway:
The script is idempotent, so this should be fine, but explicit documentation helps. ✅ Required Actions Before Merge
📋 Checklist ReviewBased on CLAUDE.md requirements:
Great work overall! This will significantly improve the contributor onboarding experience. Just need to verify those paths and complete the manual testing. 🚀 |
Code Review - PR #2191: Add bin/setup for unified development environment setupOverall AssessmentThis is a well-structured PR that adds a useful developer experience improvement. The script follows best practices and aligns with the repository's guidelines. I found one critical issue and several suggestions for improvement. Critical Issues1. Lint Failure in CIThe "Lint JS and Ruby" workflow failed. According to CLAUDE.md:
Action Required: bundle exec rubocop
# Fix any violations, then commit the changesCode Quality & Best PracticesWhat's Good:
Suggestions for Improvement:1. Consider adding ShellCheck validation The test plan mentions shellcheck bin/setup2. Consider adding a dry-run mode For transparency and safety, allow users to see what would happen: # Usage: bin/setup --dry-run3. Validate Node/Ruby versions The script could check that versions meet minimum requirements per .tool-versions. 4. Exit code consistency Consider tracking warnings and exiting with non-zero if any optional components fail, so CI can catch issues. Security ConsiderationsGood:
Minor concern:
Test CoverageFrom PR Description:
Recommendation: Test in a fresh clone or Docker container to verify the full flow works as expected. Documentation UpdatesCONTRIBUTING.md changes look good:
Suggestion: Consider adding a troubleshooting section to CONTRIBUTING.md for common setup issues (permission denied, version mismatches, etc.). Performance ConsiderationsThe script runs sequentially, which is appropriate for a setup script. The output is clear and progress is well-communicated. Alignment with Project RequirementsFollows CLAUDE.md guidelines:
Aligns with .claude/docs/testing-build-scripts.md:
Final ChecklistBefore merging:
SummaryThis is a valuable contribution that will significantly improve the developer onboarding experience. The code is well-written and follows bash scripting best practices. Once the lint issues are resolved, this will be ready to merge! Estimated time to fix: 5-10 minutes (run Great work on making the setup process more accessible! 🎉 |
Code ReviewThank you for this helpful contribution! The ✅ Strengths
🔍 Suggestions for Improvement1. Missing RuboCop compliance checkAccording to CLAUDE.md, RuboCop must pass before every commit. Consider adding a final validation step: # After all setup is complete
print_step "Running linters to verify setup..."
if bundle exec rubocop &> /dev/null; then
print_success "RuboCop passed"
else
print_warning "RuboCop found issues - run 'bundle exec rubocop -a' to auto-fix"
fi2. Git hooks installation clarificationThe script doesn't explicitly mention git hooks installation. According to CLAUDE.md:
Consider adding a note in the success message or a verification step: # In the final success message
echo " bin/setup --help # View setup options"
echo ""
echo "Note: Git hooks for automatic linting are installed and active."3. Error handling for
|
Code Review: bin/setup ScriptThank you for creating this unified setup script! This is a valuable addition that will significantly improve the contributor onboarding experience. I've reviewed the code and have several suggestions for improvement. 🟢 Strengths
🔴 Critical Issues1. Missing Git Hooks InstallationSeverity: High According to CLAUDE.md:
The script does NOT install git hooks (lefthook), which is a critical part of the development setup. Without this, contributors will:
Fix: Add after the root bundle install: # Install git hooks (after root bundle install)
print_step "Installing git hooks..."
bundle exec lefthook install
print_success "Git hooks installed"2. Incorrect Reference in CONTRIBUTING.mdLine 33 in CONTRIBUTING.md: bundle && pnpm install && rake shakapacker_examples:gen_all && rake node_package && rakeThis command still assumes you're in the Recommendation: Either:
🟡 Moderate Issues3. Missing Lefthook Prerequisite CheckThe script checks for 4. Incomplete Setup Compared to Manual InstructionsCLAUDE.md mentions several additional steps that
From CLAUDE.md: bundle && pnpm install && rake shakapacker_examples:gen_all && rake node_package && rakeYour script only runs # Generate test examples (after node_package)
print_step "Generating Shakapacker examples..."
rake shakapacker_examples:gen_all
print_success "Shakapacker examples generated"
# Optionally run tests to verify setup
print_step "Running initial tests to verify setup..."
echo "This may take a few minutes..."
rake all_but_examplesOr at minimum, mention in the final success message that users should run 5. Error Handling Could Be More SpecificThe script uses trap 'print_error "Setup failed at line $LINENO. Check the output above for details."' ERR🔵 Minor Suggestions6. Consider Adding a --skip-pro FlagFor open-source contributors who don't have access to the Pro package, you could add an option to explicitly skip Pro setup: # Usage: bin/setup --skip-pro7. Improve "Missing Prerequisites" Message for BundlerThe current message suggests bundler)
echo " - bundler: Install Ruby first (using rvm/rbenv), then: gem install bundler"
;;8. Add Verification StepAfter successful setup, consider adding a verification command in the success message: echo "To verify your setup:"
echo " rake lint # Verify linters work"
echo " bundle exec lefthook run pre-commit --all-files # Test git hooks"📋 Testing RecommendationsBased on CLAUDE.md's critical testing requirements: Before merging, please verify:
🎯 SummaryMust fix before merge:
Should fix: Nice to have: Overall AssessmentThis is a well-structured and valuable contribution that will significantly improve the developer onboarding experience. The code quality is good, and the approach is sound. The main gap is the missing git hooks installation, which contradicts the documented "automatic" behavior mentioned in CLAUDE.md. Once the critical issues are addressed, this will be a great addition to the project! 🎉 |
Code Review: bin/setup ScriptI've reviewed PR #2191 and have the following feedback: ✅ Strengths
🔍 Issues & Suggestions1. CRITICAL: Path Verification MissingPer CLAUDE.md's "Managing File Paths" guidelines, you should verify paths exist before operations: # In build_node_package(), add verification:
if [ ! -f "$ROOT_DIR/Rakefile" ]; then
print_error "Rakefile not found. Are you in the correct directory?"
exit 1
fi2. Missing Mandatory Post-Setup ValidationAccording to CLAUDE.md's "Testing Build and Package Scripts" section, the script should verify build artifacts after # After rake node_package:
if [ ! -f "packages/react-on-rails/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js" ]; then
print_error "Build failed: ReactOnRails.full.js not found"
exit 1
fi
print_success "Build artifacts verified"3. Bundle Check Silent FailuresThe if bundle check &> /dev/null; then
print_success "Ruby dependencies already satisfied"
else
if ! bundle install; then
print_error "Failed to install Ruby dependencies in $name"
exit 1
fi
print_success "Ruby dependencies installed"
fi4. Missing Git Hooks SetupAccording to CONTRIBUTING.md, git hooks are "installed automatically when you run the standard setup commands." Your script should either:
5. pnpm Install Frozen LockfilePer CLAUDE.md testing guidelines, use if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo " Installing JavaScript dependencies..."
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
print_success "JavaScript dependencies installed"
fiThis ensures lockfile is respected and matches CI behavior. 6. Error Handling for
|
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Code Review: bin/setup ScriptOverviewThis PR adds a unified ✅ Strengths1. Consistent with Existing Scripts
2. Good Error Handling
3. Clear Documentation
4. Idempotent Design
|
Key improvements based on PR review feedback: 1. Path verification: Added verify_root_directory() to check Rakefile and package.json exist before proceeding 2. Build artifact validation: Added verify_build_artifacts() to verify packages/react-on-rails/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js exists after build 3. Error handling: Improved bundle install error handling with explicit failure detection and messages 4. CI-like behavior: Use pnpm install --frozen-lockfile to match CI and ensure lockfile integrity 5. Rake error handling: Added error handling for rake node_package 6. Version display: Show Ruby, Node, pnpm, and Bundler versions during prerequisites check 7. --skip-pro flag: Added for contributors without Pro access 8. Elapsed time: Display total setup time at completion 9. Git hooks documentation: Added message about automatic git hooks installation 10. CONTRIBUTING.md: Added version verification example before setup 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Code Review: bin/setup ScriptI've reviewed PR #2191 and have the following feedback: ✅ Strengths
🔍 Potential Issues & Suggestions1. Security: Unquoted Variable ExpansionLines 159-163 use # Current (line 159):
if \! pnpm install --frozen-lockfile; then
# Safer (though pnpm is unlikely to have spaces):
if \! pnpm install --frozen-lockfile; thenActually, the current code is fine here since there are no variable expansions in the command itself. However, ensure all path variables are quoted when used:
Status: ✅ The script already properly quotes all variable expansions. 2. bundle check Exit Code HandlingLine 144-145 uses if bundle check &> /dev/null; then
print_success "Ruby dependencies already satisfied"This is correct, but since if bundle check &> /dev/null; then
print_success "Ruby dependencies already satisfied"
else
if \! bundle install; then
print_error "Failed to install Ruby dependencies in $name"
exit 1
fi
print_success "Ruby dependencies installed"
fiCurrent code: Uses implicit `||" operator via the if/else structure, which is fine. ✅ 3. Potential Race Condition: Build VerificationLines 178-186 verify build artifacts immediately after verify_build_artifacts() {
print_step "Verifying build artifacts..."
local artifact="packages/react-on-rails/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js"
# Give file system a moment to flush
sleep 0.5
if [ \! -f "$ROOT_DIR/$artifact" ]; then
print_error "Build failed: $artifact not found"
print_error "Expected location: $ROOT_DIR/$artifact"
exit 1
fi
print_success "Build artifacts verified"
}Likelihood: Very low, but 4. Missing Verification: Pro Package Build ArtifactsThe script verifies verify_build_artifacts() {
print_step "Verifying build artifacts..."
local artifact="packages/react-on-rails/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js"
if [ \! -f "$ROOT_DIR/$artifact" ]; then
print_error "Build failed: $artifact not found"
print_error "Expected location: $ROOT_DIR/$artifact"
exit 1
fi
# Verify Pro artifacts if Pro is present and not skipped
if [ "$SKIP_PRO" = false ] && [ -d "$ROOT_DIR/react_on_rails_pro" ]; then
local pro_artifact="packages/react-on-rails-pro/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js"
if [ \! -f "$ROOT_DIR/$pro_artifact" ]; then
print_warning "Pro build artifact not found: $pro_artifact"
print_warning "This may be expected if Pro package doesn't have a separate build"
fi
fi
print_success "Build artifacts verified"
}Note: Only add this if Pro actually generates separate build artifacts. Check the Pro package structure first. 5. Documentation: Testing InstructionsThe PR description includes excellent manual testing requirements, but these should be documented in the script's comments or in a separate testing doc. Consider adding to CLAUDE.md: ## Testing bin/setup
Before pushing changes to bin/setup, verify:
- [ ] Fresh clone test (not existing dev environment)
- [ ] With Pro directory present
- [ ] Without Pro directory (or use --skip-pro)
- [ ] From different working directories
- [ ] Build artifacts exist: `ls -la packages/react-on-rails/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js`
- [ ] Post-setup commands work: `rake` and `rake lint`📝 Minor Suggestions
🎯 Action ItemsMust Fix:
Should Consider:
Nice to Have:
✅ Test Coverage AssessmentThe PR description includes excellent test coverage:
Missing from test plan (per CLAUDE.md §CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS):
📊 Overall AssessmentCode Quality: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
Best Practices: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
Security: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
Documentation: ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5)
Recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor suggestions This is a high-quality contribution that significantly improves the contributor experience. The suggestions above are minor refinements, not blockers. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
Feedback from Local TestingI tested the precompile workflow locally and found some issues that affect this PR: Key Issue:
|
Code Review: bin/setup ScriptI've reviewed PR #2191 and overall this is a well-structured and valuable addition to the project. The script will significantly improve the contributor onboarding experience. Here's my detailed feedback: ✅ Strengths1. Excellent Error Handling
2. User Experience
3. CI Alignment
4. Robust Path Handling
🔍 Issues & SuggestionsCritical: Missing
|
Code Review FeedbackThank you for this contribution! This is a valuable addition that will significantly improve the developer onboarding experience. ✅ Strengths
🔍 Code Quality - Excellent ✅
|
Code Review - PR #2191: Add bin/setup for unified development environment setupOverall AssessmentThis is a well-crafted PR that adds significant value to the developer experience. The implementation is thorough, follows bash best practices, and aligns well with the project's guidelines in CLAUDE.md. Recommendation: Approve with minor suggestions Strengths
Suggestions for Improvement1. Bundle Check Logic (Minor UX Enhancement) 2. pnpm Frozen Lockfile Error Messaging (Minor Enhancement) 3. Verify Artifacts Path 4. Optional: Ruby/Node Version Checks (Future Enhancement) Testing CoverageYour manual testing checklist is excellent and covers all critical scenarios. Additional suggestion: Test with intentionally corrupted pnpm-lock.yaml to verify error message is helpful. Security, Performance, BugsNo security concerns or significant bugs identified. Performance is efficient with bundle check pre-checks and conditional Pro package skipping. Changelog EntryPer CLAUDE.md, this is a user-visible improvement and should have a changelog entry: Developer Experience
Great work! The code quality is high, testing plan is thorough, and it will significantly improve the contributor onboarding experience. |
Code Review - Fresh AnalysisI've conducted a thorough review of this PR, focusing on areas that complement the existing feedback. Overall, this is a well-implemented script with strong attention to detail. Here are my findings: ✅ Strengths
🔍 Potential Issues & Suggestions1. Missing RuboCop Compliance Check (Critical per CLAUDE.md)The CLAUDE.md states:
The setup script doesn't verify it can run RuboCop successfully. Consider adding: # After installing root dependencies
print_step "Verifying linting setup..."
if ! bundle exec rubocop --version &> /dev/null; then
print_error "Failed to verify RuboCop installation"
exit 1
fi
print_success "Linting tools verified"2. Bundle Check Logic Could Be ImprovedCurrent code: if bundle check &> /dev/null; then
print_success "Ruby dependencies already satisfied"
else
if ! bundle install; thenIssue: Recommendation: Remove the 3. Missing Verification of Git Hooks InstallationCLAUDE.md emphasizes:
But the completion message just states they've been installed without verification. Consider: # After setup completes
if [ -f ".git/hooks/pre-commit" ]; then
print_success "Git hooks installed"
else
print_warning "Git hooks not found - they should be auto-installed on first commit"
fi4. pnpm install Error Messages Could Be More HelpfulWhen
Consider enhanced error output: if ! pnpm install --frozen-lockfile; then
print_error "Failed to install JavaScript dependencies in $name"
echo ""
echo "Common causes:"
echo " - pnpm version mismatch (need 9.x+)"
echo " - Node version mismatch (check .node-version)"
echo " - Lockfile out of sync (try: rm pnpm-lock.yaml && pnpm install)"
exit 1
fi5. Consider Adding Verification StepPer CLAUDE.md's testing-build-scripts.md, after setup should verify: verify_setup() {
print_step "Verifying setup..."
# Check critical artifacts exist
local artifacts=(
"packages/react-on-rails/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js"
)
for artifact in "${artifacts[@]}"; do
if [ ! -f "$ROOT_DIR/$artifact" ]; then
print_error "Setup verification failed: $artifact not found"
return 1
fi
done
print_success "Setup verification passed"
}6. Minor: Inconsistent Directory Existence CheckThe script checks 🔒 Security Considerations✅ No security issues found:
🎯 Test Coverage RecommendationsThe PR's test plan is good, but consider adding these verification steps to the manual testing checklist: # After bin/setup completes:
# 1. Verify all critical artifacts exist
ls -la packages/react-on-rails/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js
ls -la node_modules # Should exist in root
ls -la react_on_rails/spec/dummy/node_modules # Should exist
# 2. Verify linting works
bundle exec rubocop --version
pnpm run lint --help
# 3. Verify git hooks are ready (they install on first commit)
ls -la .git/hooks/
# 4. Try a basic rake command
rake --version📝 Documentation ImprovementsThe CONTRIBUTING.md updates are excellent! One minor suggestion: In the "Manual Setup" section, consider adding a note about why someone might choose manual setup: ### Manual Setup (Alternative)
If you prefer to set up manually or need more control (e.g., selective installation, debugging setup issues):🚀 Performance Considerations✅ No performance issues:
✨ Overall VerdictThis is a high-quality contribution that significantly improves developer experience. The code follows bash best practices and aligns well with the project's conventions. Recommendation: Approve with minor suggestions The suggestions above are mostly optional improvements. The core functionality is solid and ready to merge. The only critical consideration is whether to keep the Great work! 🎉 |
Code Review: bin/setup ScriptI've reviewed PR #2191 and have the following feedback: ✅ Strengths
🔧 Issues & Recommendations1. CRITICAL: Missing
|
Code Review: bin/setup ScriptGreat work on creating a unified setup script! This will significantly improve the contributor onboarding experience. ✅ Strengths
🐛 Issues and Concerns1. CRITICAL: set -e without set -u and set -o pipefailIssue: The script uses set -e but not the safer set -euo pipefail used in other scripts like bin/ci-switch-config. Current (line 13): set -e Why this matters:
Reference: Line 9 of bin/ci-switch-config shows the correct pattern. 2. WARNING: Inconsistent Behavior with bundle checkThe script skips bundle install if dependencies are satisfied (lines 140-151). When bundle check passes, we won't pick up new gems added to Gemfile until someone runs bundle install manually. Recommendation: This is probably fine for a setup script, but consider documenting in CONTRIBUTING.md that developers should run bundle install after git pull to pick up new dependencies. 3. DOCUMENTATION: Missing Context for rake node_packageRecommendation: Add a comment explaining what this does - it builds TypeScript packages and runs pnpm yalc:publish for local development 4. EDGE CASE: No Verification of PNPM VersionThe script checks for pnpm existence but not version. The project uses packageManager: [email protected]. Recommendation: Consider adding a version check to warn about version mismatches. Impact: Low priority - pnpm 9 is backward compatible. 📝 Documentation ReviewThe CONTRIBUTING.md changes are excellent:
Minor suggestion: Add a troubleshooting section for common issues. ✅ Testing CoverageThe PR description includes excellent manual testing requirements. Suggest adding:
🎯 Summary and RecommendationsMust Fix Before Merge:
Should Consider: Nice to Have: 🚀 Overall AssessmentThis is a high-quality PR that significantly improves developer experience. The code is well-structured, follows project conventions, and includes comprehensive error handling. Once the critical set -euo pipefail fix is applied, this is ready to merge. Code Quality: 9/10 Great work! |
- Use set -euo pipefail for stricter error handling (matches bin/ci-switch-config) - Add comment explaining what rake node_package does 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Code ReviewThis is an excellent addition that will significantly improve the contributor experience! The script is well-structured, follows bash best practices, and handles edge cases gracefully. Here's my detailed review: ✅ StrengthsCode Quality
Best Practices Alignment
Security & Reliability
🔍 Observations & Minor Suggestions1. Path Reference in Comment (Line 173)Current: # This compiles node_package/src/ to lib/ and makes packages available locally.Observation: The comment mentions Suggested fix: # This compiles packages/react-on-rails/src/ to lib/ and makes packages available locally.2. Error Message ConsistencyThe script uses 3. Build Artifact Verification (Lines 182-192)Current behavior: Only verifies Consider: Should we also verify Pro package artifacts when Optional enhancement: verify_build_artifacts() {
print_step "Verifying build artifacts..."
local artifact="packages/react-on-rails/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js"
if [ ! -f "$ROOT_DIR/$artifact" ]; then
print_error "Build failed: $artifact not found"
print_error "Expected location: $ROOT_DIR/$artifact"
exit 1
fi
# Verify Pro artifacts if Pro package was set up
if [ "$SKIP_PRO" = false ] && [ -d "$ROOT_DIR/react_on_rails_pro" ]; then
local pro_artifact="packages/react-on-rails-pro/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js"
if [ ! -f "$ROOT_DIR/$pro_artifact" ]; then
print_warning "Pro build artifact not found: $pro_artifact"
fi
fi
print_success "Build artifacts verified"
}However, this is optional and not blocking—the current implementation is sufficient. 4. Relationship with
|
Code Review: bin/setup ScriptI've reviewed PR #2191 and the implementation looks excellent overall! ✅ Strengths1. Excellent Code Quality
2. Follows Project Guidelines
3. Robustness
4. Security & Best Practices
🔍 Observations & Minor Suggestions1. Build Artifact Path Verification ✅The script verifies packages/react-on-rails/lib/ReactOnRails.full.js exists after running rake node_package. I verified this is correct by checking react_on_rails/rakelib/node_package.rake which runs pnpm run build && pnpm yalc:publish. Status: ✅ Path is correct and will work as expected. 2. Bundle Check Optimization ✅The script already optimizes bundle install with bundle check - nice work! This makes re-running the script much faster. 📋 Testing RecommendationsPer CLAUDE.md critical requirements, ensure these manual tests are completed:
The fresh clone test is CRITICAL per CLAUDE.md - it's the best way to catch assumptions about local state. 🎯 Code-Specific CommentsLines 169-172: Excellent Choice ✅Using rake node_package instead of directly calling pnpm run build ensures consistency with CI. Right approach. Lines 115-127: Strong Validation ✅Excellent defensive programming - prevents silent failures from running in the wrong directory. Lines 251-262: Pro Package Handling ✅Perfect logic for handling open-source contributors without Pro access. Lines 155-165: pnpm Frozen Lockfile ✅This matches CI behavior per CLAUDE.md requirements. Excellent! 📝 Documentation ReviewCONTRIBUTING.md changes look great with clear Quick Setup vs Manual Setup sections. Minor suggestion: Around line 29-30, consider noting that bin/setup replaces the first part of the setup command. 🚀 Final VerdictLGTM with minor suggestions! 🎉 This is well-implemented and will significantly improve contributor onboarding. Code follows bash best practices and adheres to project guidelines. Before Merging:
Key Strengths:
Great work! 🚀 CI Status: ✅ All checks passing (25/25 workflows succeeded) |
Summary
Adds a unified
bin/setupscript that installs all dependencies across the monorepo, making it easy for new contributors to get started quickly with a single command.Changes
bin/setupscript for unified development environment setupCONTRIBUTING.mdwith quick setup instructions referencing the new scriptFeatures
rake node_package--frozen-lockfilefor pnpm to match CI behavior--skip-proflag for contributors without Pro access--helpflag for usage informationManual Testing Requirements
Before merging, verify the following (per CLAUDE.md requirements):
Test Scenarios
--skip-pro)Build Verification
After setup completes, verify:
Post-Setup Commands
Verify these work after setup:
Additional Tests
--helpshows usageUsage
Test plan
bin/setup --helpdisplays usage correctly🤖 Generated with Claude Code