Syntax highlighting in diff #123
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
samisalreadytaken
force-pushed
the
diff
branch
from
c628277 to
600b81e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The first commit renames diff colours to their matching functionality instead of vague DiffRed, DiffGreen names. This makes editing them simpler. Though half of them were unused, maybe I'm misunderstanding their purpose.
The second commit enables syntax highlighting on diff lines. This was previously mentioned here where it was removed. I would agree that the syntax highlighting should be preserved. See image for the difference: