Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Appearance settings

View all features
- BY COMPANY SIZE
  Enterprises
  Small and medium teams
  Startups
  Nonprofits
- BY USE CASE
  App Modernization
  DevSecOps
  DevOps
  CI/CD
  View all use cases
- BY INDUSTRY
  Healthcare
  Financial services
  Manufacturing
  Government
  View all industries
View all solutions
- EXPLORE BY TOPIC
  AI
  Software Development
  DevOps
  Security
  View all topics
- EXPLORE BY TYPE
  Customer stories
  Events & webinars
  Ebooks & reports
  Business insights
  GitHub Skills
- SUPPORT & SERVICES
  Documentation
  Customer support
  Community forum
  Trust center
  Partners
- COMMUNITY
  GitHub SponsorsFund open source developers
- PROGRAMS
  Security Lab
  Maintainer Community
  Accelerator
  Archive Program
- REPOSITORIES
  Topics
  Trending
  Collections
- ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS
  Enterprise platformAI-powered developer platform
- AVAILABLE ADD-ONS
  GitHub Advanced SecurityEnterprise-grade security features
  Copilot for BusinessEnterprise-grade AI features
  Premium SupportEnterprise-grade 24/7 support
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

Appearance settings

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

vercel / next.js Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 30k
Star 136k

Code
Issues 2.1k
Pull requests 1.1k
Discussions
Actions
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Discussions
Actions
Security
Insights

Back to pull request #86888

[turbopack] improve fragment handling in the resolver #89332

Sign in to view logs

Sign in to view logs

[turbopack] improve fragment handling in the resolver

[turbopack] improve fragment handling in the resolver #89332

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Summary
Jobs
- Graphite CI Optimizer
- Determine changes
- build
- validate-docs-links
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- Test
- build
- build
- ast-grep lint
- build
- test next-swc wasi
- build
- Run devlow benchmarks
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- test rspack dev
- test rspack development integration
- test rspack production
- test rspack production integration
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- build
- thank you, next
Run details
- Usage
- Workflow file

Usage Workflow file

test turbopack dev (5/7) / build

test turbopack dev (5/7) / build

succeeded Dec 6, 2025 in 7m 28s

Loading

Re-running jobs...

You can’t perform that action at this time.