Skip to content

docs: add data synchronization patterns recipe#1109

Closed
johnlindquist wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/data-sync
Closed

docs: add data synchronization patterns recipe#1109
johnlindquist wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/data-sync

Conversation

@johnlindquist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • Adds new Recipes documentation section for real-world workflow patterns
  • Creates data synchronization guide covering polling, batch sync, webhook-driven sync, reconciliation, and idempotent writes
  • Motivated by usage data: 100 teams building sync workflows with zero existing documentation

Test plan

  • Verify MDX renders correctly
  • Verify code examples are syntactically valid
  • Verify meta.json navigation works

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 18, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 24d69a5

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link
Contributor

vercel bot commented Feb 18, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.033s (-2.1%) 1.005s (~) 0.972s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.034s (+5.6% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.971s 10 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.140s (-70.5% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.870s 10 4.25x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.149s (+43.7% 🔺) 1.010s (~) 0.861s 10 4.50x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 0.533s (-22.7% 🟢) 1.959s (-5.7% 🟢) 1.425s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 0.610s (-25.0% 🟢) 2.080s (+0.6%) 1.470s 10 1.14x
▲ Vercel Nitro 0.716s (-32.8% 🟢) 2.178s (-12.3% 🟢) 1.462s 10 1.34x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.105s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.900s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.125s (+1.9%) 2.006s (~) 0.882s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.364s (-4.6%) 3.015s (~) 0.651s 10 2.14x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.460s (+4.8%) 3.014s (~) 0.554s 10 2.23x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.380s (+5.9% 🔺) 3.627s (+16.8% 🔺) 1.247s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.504s (+9.3% 🔺) 3.538s (+12.7% 🔺) 1.035s 10 1.05x
▲ Vercel Express 2.849s (+30.6% 🔺) 3.584s (+13.7% 🔺) 0.734s 10 1.20x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 10.825s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.199s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Express 10.899s (+0.8%) 11.022s (~) 0.123s 3 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 20.311s (+0.5%) 21.056s (~) 0.746s 2 1.88x
🐘 Postgres Express 20.358s (~) 21.060s (~) 0.702s 2 1.88x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 16.981s (-3.9%) 17.849s (-5.0%) 0.868s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 17.578s (~) 19.242s (~) 1.665s 2 1.04x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 17.869s (-10.3% 🟢) 19.237s (-7.8% 🟢) 1.368s 2 1.05x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 27.480s (~) 28.050s (~) 0.570s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Express 27.769s (+1.1%) 28.052s (~) 0.283s 3 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 49.569s (-1.8%) 50.118s (-2.0%) 0.550s 2 1.80x
🐘 Postgres Express 50.367s (~) 51.131s (+1.0%) 0.764s 2 1.83x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 105.358s (+143.7% 🔺) 106.697s (+138.1% 🔺) 1.339s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 117.824s (+172.3% 🔺) 119.000s (+168.7% 🔺) 1.176s 2 1.12x
▲ Vercel Express 118.793s (+176.9% 🔺) 120.299s (+172.9% 🔺) 1.505s 2 1.13x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 57.290s (~) 58.102s (~) 0.812s 2 1.00x
💻 Local Express 57.980s (+1.4%) 58.608s (+0.9%) 0.628s 2 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 92.249s (-7.9% 🟢) 93.213s (-7.0% 🟢) 0.964s 1 1.61x
🐘 Postgres Express 100.262s (~) 101.237s (~) 0.975s 1 1.75x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 192.350s (+117.7% 🔺) 193.614s (+117.3% 🔺) 1.264s 1 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 224.796s (+159.5% 🔺) 226.036s (+157.2% 🔺) 1.240s 1 1.17x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 229.180s (+160.2% 🔺) 230.112s (+157.4% 🔺) 0.932s 1 1.19x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.417s (-1.3%) 2.006s (~) 0.589s 15 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.439s (+2.7%) 2.006s (~) 0.566s 15 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.308s (-4.2%) 3.015s (~) 0.708s 10 1.63x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.403s (+12.5% 🔺) 3.014s (~) 0.611s 10 1.70x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.722s (+17.9% 🔺) 4.040s (+22.6% 🔺) 1.318s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.801s (-18.0% 🟢) 3.818s (-11.4% 🟢) 1.017s 8 1.03x
▲ Vercel Express 2.903s (+19.6% 🔺) 3.919s (+16.2% 🔺) 1.016s 8 1.07x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 2.596s (~) 3.007s (~) 0.411s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 2.697s (+5.7% 🔺) 3.007s (~) 0.310s 10 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Express 9.114s (+12.9% 🔺) 9.540s (+15.2% 🔺) 0.426s 4 3.51x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 9.554s (+12.6% 🔺) 10.029s (+10.9% 🔺) 0.476s 3 3.68x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 6.188s (+132.8% 🔺) 8.552s (+147.3% 🔺) 2.364s 4 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 6.229s (+95.4% 🔺) 7.592s (+93.9% 🔺) 1.362s 4 1.01x
▲ Vercel Express 10.671s (+243.4% 🔺) 12.448s (+194.3% 🔺) 1.777s 3 1.72x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 7.435s (+1.2%) 8.017s (~) 0.582s 4 1.00x
💻 Local Express 7.807s (+7.3% 🔺) 8.018s (~) 0.211s 4 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Express 44.006s (+5.7% 🔺) 44.158s (+4.9%) 0.152s 1 5.92x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 44.762s (-7.4% 🟢) 45.107s (-8.2% 🟢) 0.345s 1 6.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 9.017s (+94.4% 🔺) 11.018s (+96.0% 🔺) 2.002s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 9.837s (+93.7% 🔺) 10.889s (+78.5% 🔺) 1.051s 3 1.09x
▲ Vercel Nitro 13.880s (+315.4% 🔺) 15.129s (+251.8% 🔺) 1.249s 2 1.54x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.422s (-0.6%) 2.004s (~) 0.583s 15 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.465s (+3.2%) 2.006s (~) 0.541s 15 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.085s (-8.2% 🟢) 2.741s (+2.2%) 0.656s 11 1.47x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.097s (+6.8% 🔺) 2.398s (-4.6%) 0.301s 13 1.47x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.757s (+22.6% 🔺) 3.912s (+21.7% 🔺) 1.155s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.761s (+24.9% 🔺) 3.369s (+3.0%) 0.608s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 3.273s (+23.0% 🔺) 4.702s (+29.2% 🔺) 1.428s 7 1.19x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 2.675s (~) 3.008s (~) 0.332s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 2.832s (+5.5% 🔺) 3.109s (+3.4%) 0.276s 10 1.06x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.449s (-21.6% 🟢) 11.031s (-19.5% 🟢) 0.582s 3 3.91x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.645s (-7.1% 🟢) 11.034s (-8.3% 🟢) 0.389s 3 3.98x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.925s (+16.6% 🔺) 4.389s (+27.6% 🔺) 1.464s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 3.491s (+51.4% 🔺) 4.641s (+45.9% 🔺) 1.151s 7 1.19x
▲ Vercel Express 5.701s (+115.5% 🔺) 6.716s (+88.8% 🔺) 1.015s 5 1.95x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 7.807s (-0.8%) 8.269s (~) 0.462s 4 1.00x
💻 Local Express 8.085s (~) 8.521s (+3.1%) 0.436s 4 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Express 48.096s (-6.7% 🟢) 48.118s (-7.7% 🟢) 0.022s 1 6.16x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 51.580s (-0.7%) 52.104s (~) 0.524s 1 6.61x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 10.604s (+242.4% 🔺) 11.779s (+195.6% 🔺) 1.174s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 10.764s (+179.1% 🔺) 11.340s (+143.9% 🔺) 0.576s 3 1.02x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 15.513s (+302.1% 🔺) 17.103s (+240.0% 🔺) 1.590s 2 1.46x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.176s (~) 1.003s (~) 0.011s (-2.7%) 1.016s (~) 0.840s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.182s (+8.1% 🔺) 1.002s (~) 0.013s (+13.9% 🔺) 1.019s (~) 0.837s 10 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.393s (-37.5% 🟢) 1.646s (-41.6% 🟢) 0.001s (-23.5% 🟢) 2.012s (-33.3% 🟢) 0.620s 10 7.92x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.371s (-3.5%) 2.672s (+3.4%) 0.001s (-7.7% 🟢) 3.015s (~) 0.644s 10 13.48x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 1.934s (-1.7%) 2.536s (-3.8%) 0.206s (-66.0% 🟢) 3.214s (-15.4% 🟢) 1.280s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 1.992s (+2.8%) 2.711s (+0.8%) 0.153s (-73.9% 🟢) 3.450s (-9.7% 🟢) 1.458s 10 1.03x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.041s (-18.0% 🟢) 3.080s (~) 0.185s (-20.3% 🟢) 3.833s (-0.6%) 1.793s 10 1.06x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Nitro 12/12
🐘 Postgres Nitro 7/12
▲ Vercel Express 5/12
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 💻 Local 12/12
Next.js (Turbopack) ▲ Vercel 12/12
Nitro 💻 Local 12/12
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 532 2 38 572
✅ 💻 Local Development 556 0 68 624
✅ 📦 Local Production 556 0 68 624
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 556 0 68 624
✅ 🪟 Windows 49 0 3 52
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 111 45 9 165
✅ 📋 Other 135 0 21 156
Total 2495 47 275 2817

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (2 failed)

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive

nuxt (1 failed):

  • promiseAnyWorkflow
🌍 Community Worlds (45 failed)

turso (45 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow
  • addTenWorkflow
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow
  • promiseRaceWorkflow
  • promiseAnyWorkflow
  • hookWorkflow
  • webhookWorkflow
  • sleepingWorkflow
  • parallelSleepWorkflow
  • nullByteWorkflow
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow
  • fetchWorkflow
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling retry behavior workflow completes despite transient 5xx on step_completed
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars)
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply()
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 48 0 4
✅ example 48 0 4
✅ express 48 0 4
✅ fastify 48 0 4
✅ hono 48 0 4
❌ nextjs-turbopack 50 1 1
✅ nextjs-webpack 51 0 1
✅ nitro 48 0 4
❌ nuxt 47 1 4
✅ sveltekit 48 0 4
✅ vite 48 0 4
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 49 0 3
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 3 0 0
✅ mongodb 49 0 3
✅ redis-dev 3 0 0
✅ redis 49 0 3
✅ turso-dev 3 0 0
❌ turso 4 45 3
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 45 0 7
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 45 0 7
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 45 0 7

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@johnlindquist
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #1116 which consolidates all recipes into a single PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant