Skip to content

Update hero to "React for the backend"#1823

Open
pranaygp wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
v0/pranaygp-45bc3cf7
Open

Update hero to "React for the backend"#1823
pranaygp wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
v0/pranaygp-45bc3cf7

Conversation

@pranaygp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates the homepage hero title and byline as requested by @Pranay Prakash.

What changed

  • Hero title: "Make any TypeScript Function Durable" → "React for the backend"
  • Byline: Updated to emphasize building and distributing long-running, durable, reliable and observable workflows and AI agents
  • Page metadata title updated to match

Slack Thread

Updated page title and description to reflect backend usage of React with Workflow SDK

Slack-Thread: https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C09R2J37F6K/p1776797760051119?thread_ts=1776797760.051119&cid=C09R2J37F6K
Co-authored-by: Pranay Prakash <1797812+pranaygp@users.noreply.github.com>
@pranaygp pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code owner April 21, 2026 21:42
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 21, 2026 21:42
@pranaygp pranaygp added the v0 label Apr 21, 2026 — with Vercel
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 1b346d1

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ 💻 Local Development 1054 0 86 1140
✅ 📦 Local Production 1054 0 86 1140
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 1054 0 86 1140
✅ 📋 Other 267 0 18 285
Total 3429 0 276 3705

Details by Category

✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 89 0 6
✅ express-stable 89 0 6
✅ fastify-stable 89 0 6
✅ hono-stable 89 0 6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 76 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 95 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 76 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 95 0 0
✅ nitro-stable 89 0 6
✅ nuxt-stable 89 0 6
✅ sveltekit-stable 89 0 6
✅ vite-stable 89 0 6
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 89 0 6
✅ express-stable 89 0 6
✅ fastify-stable 89 0 6
✅ hono-stable 89 0 6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 76 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 95 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 76 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 95 0 0
✅ nitro-stable 89 0 6
✅ nuxt-stable 89 0 6
✅ sveltekit-stable 89 0 6
✅ vite-stable 89 0 6
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 89 0 6
✅ express-stable 89 0 6
✅ fastify-stable 89 0 6
✅ hono-stable 89 0 6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 76 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 95 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 76 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 95 0 0
✅ nitro-stable 89 0 6
✅ nuxt-stable 89 0 6
✅ sveltekit-stable 89 0 6
✅ vite-stable 89 0 6
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 89 0 6
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 89 0 6
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 89 0 6

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: cancelled

Check the workflow run for details.

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 21, 2026 9:46pm

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.035s (-19.0% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.970s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.042s (-5.6% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.964s 10 1.20x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.050s 1.006s 0.956s 10 1.43x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.057s 1.011s 0.954s 10 1.63x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.061s (-36.3% 🟢) 1.010s (-3.2%) 0.950s 10 1.74x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.061s (+5.7% 🔺) 1.009s (~) 0.948s 10 1.76x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.097s (-3.0%) 2.007s (~) 0.910s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.122s 2.006s 0.884s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Express 1.127s (~) 2.006s (~) 0.879s 10 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.135s 2.010s 0.874s 10 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.145s (~) 2.009s (~) 0.864s 10 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.145s (~) 2.011s (~) 0.865s 10 1.04x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 10.651s (-2.7%) 11.023s (~) 0.372s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 10.831s 11.023s 0.192s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.857s 11.024s 0.167s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.895s (~) 11.024s (~) 0.128s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.901s (-0.6%) 11.020s (~) 0.119s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Express 10.962s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.061s 3 1.03x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 14.227s (-5.5% 🟢) 15.031s (-6.2% 🟢) 0.804s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 14.434s 15.023s 0.589s 4 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.581s (~) 15.021s (~) 0.440s 4 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.620s (~) 15.023s (~) 0.403s 4 1.03x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 14.717s 15.030s 0.313s 4 1.03x
💻 Local Express 15.055s (+0.6%) 15.280s (+1.7%) 0.225s 4 1.06x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 13.759s 14.022s 0.263s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.096s (+0.9%) 14.593s (+2.0%) 0.497s 7 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.143s (+1.0%) 15.032s (+3.0%) 0.888s 6 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 14.940s (-11.0% 🟢) 15.028s (-11.8% 🟢) 0.088s 6 1.09x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 16.277s 17.032s 0.755s 6 1.18x
💻 Local Express 17.015s (+2.5%) 17.532s (+2.9%) 0.518s 6 1.24x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.243s 2.011s 0.768s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.272s (+0.9%) 2.010s (~) 0.738s 15 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.276s (~) 2.010s (~) 0.734s 15 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 1.454s (-10.9% 🟢) 2.006s (-3.3%) 0.552s 15 1.17x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.532s 2.006s 0.474s 15 1.23x
💻 Local Express 1.571s (+5.5% 🔺) 2.006s (~) 0.435s 15 1.26x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.348s (-0.5%) 3.011s (~) 0.663s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.361s (~) 3.010s (~) 0.648s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 2.416s 3.010s 0.594s 10 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 2.569s (-18.3% 🟢) 3.008s (-22.6% 🟢) 0.439s 10 1.09x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 3.073s 3.760s 0.687s 8 1.31x
💻 Local Express 3.103s (+5.1% 🔺) 3.761s (+8.9% 🔺) 0.657s 8 1.32x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.484s (~) 4.012s (~) 0.528s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.494s (~) 4.012s (~) 0.517s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.678s 4.012s 0.335s 8 1.06x
💻 Local Nitro 6.678s (-20.0% 🟢) 7.016s (-22.2% 🟢) 0.337s 5 1.92x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 8.263s 8.771s 0.508s 4 2.37x
💻 Local Express 9.180s (+10.1% 🔺) 9.771s (+8.3% 🔺) 0.591s 4 2.64x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.233s 2.011s 0.778s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.260s (~) 2.008s (~) 0.748s 15 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.274s (+1.3%) 2.009s (~) 0.735s 15 1.03x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.513s 2.006s 0.493s 15 1.23x
💻 Local Nitro 1.525s (-18.2% 🟢) 2.006s (-14.3% 🟢) 0.480s 15 1.24x
💻 Local Express 1.593s (-15.9% 🟢) 2.006s (-15.1% 🟢) 0.413s 15 1.29x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.346s (~) 3.010s (~) 0.664s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 2.386s 3.009s 0.623s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.441s (+4.4%) 3.111s (+3.3%) 0.669s 10 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 2.712s (-11.5% 🟢) 3.008s (-22.6% 🟢) 0.295s 10 1.16x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.936s 3.453s 0.517s 9 1.25x
💻 Local Express 3.254s (+3.9%) 4.010s (+6.6% 🔺) 0.756s 8 1.39x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.486s (~) 4.011s (~) 0.525s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.490s (~) 4.008s (~) 0.519s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.664s 4.012s 0.348s 8 1.05x
💻 Local Nitro 7.332s (-19.8% 🟢) 8.015s (-20.0% 🟢) 0.682s 4 2.10x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 8.498s 9.020s 0.522s 4 2.44x
💻 Local Express 9.779s (+11.1% 🔺) 10.354s (+11.7% 🔺) 0.575s 3 2.81x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.708s (-27.8% 🟢) 1.004s (-8.2% 🟢) 0.296s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.771s 1.006s 0.235s 60 1.09x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.831s (-1.0%) 1.006s (-1.7%) 0.175s 60 1.17x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.831s (+1.3%) 1.006s (~) 0.175s 60 1.17x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.871s 1.022s 0.151s 59 1.23x
💻 Local Express 1.047s (+6.4% 🔺) 2.007s (+86.5% 🔺) 0.960s 30 1.48x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.893s 2.030s 0.137s 45 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.971s (+2.3%) 2.258s (+7.5% 🔺) 0.287s 40 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.986s (~) 2.441s (+8.1% 🔺) 0.455s 37 1.05x
💻 Local Nitro 2.323s (-23.5% 🟢) 3.008s (-20.0% 🟢) 0.685s 30 1.23x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.726s 3.008s 0.282s 30 1.44x
💻 Local Express 3.130s (+3.8%) 4.011s (+11.9% 🔺) 0.881s 23 1.65x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.883s 4.109s 0.226s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 4.068s (-0.9%) 4.742s (+3.0%) 0.675s 26 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Express 4.124s (+3.4%) 4.781s (+9.4% 🔺) 0.656s 26 1.06x
💻 Local Nitro 7.665s (-17.6% 🟢) 8.149s (-18.7% 🟢) 0.484s 15 1.97x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 8.944s 9.480s 0.536s 13 2.30x
💻 Local Express 9.422s (+2.3%) 10.020s (~) 0.598s 12 2.43x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.254s 1.007s 0.753s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.287s (+1.3%) 1.007s (~) 0.720s 60 1.13x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.287s (+1.6%) 1.007s (~) 0.720s 60 1.13x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.588s 1.005s 0.417s 60 2.32x
💻 Local Nitro 0.613s (+1.4%) 1.022s (~) 0.408s 59 2.42x
💻 Local Express 0.628s (+12.0% 🔺) 1.022s (+1.7%) 0.394s 59 2.48x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.485s 1.006s 0.521s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.505s (-0.9%) 1.007s (~) 0.502s 90 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.512s (+3.1%) 1.007s (~) 0.495s 90 1.05x
💻 Local Nitro 2.491s (-1.9%) 3.008s (~) 0.517s 30 5.13x
💻 Local Express 2.594s (+3.2%) 3.010s (~) 0.415s 30 5.35x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.681s 3.009s 0.328s 30 5.52x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.751s 1.006s 0.254s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.818s (+3.5%) 1.009s (~) 0.191s 119 1.09x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.841s (+2.7%) 1.019s (~) 0.178s 118 1.12x
💻 Local Nitro 10.469s (-6.4% 🟢) 11.024s (-5.5% 🟢) 0.555s 11 13.93x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 11.316s 11.845s 0.529s 11 15.06x
💻 Local Express 11.575s (+3.4%) 12.028s (+0.7%) 0.454s 10 15.40x
Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.142s (-33.4% 🟢) 1.004s (~) 0.010s (-19.2% 🟢) 1.016s (~) 0.874s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.181s 1.003s 0.013s 1.019s 0.839s 10 1.27x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.198s 1.001s 0.001s 1.010s 0.813s 10 1.39x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.214s (+4.1%) 0.999s (~) 0.001s (-18.8% 🟢) 1.012s (~) 0.798s 10 1.50x
💻 Local Express 0.215s (+8.0% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.013s (+10.7% 🔺) 1.020s (~) 0.805s 10 1.51x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.221s (+7.8% 🔺) 0.998s (~) 0.002s (~) 1.011s (~) 0.790s 10 1.55x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.601s (-28.4% 🟢) 1.011s (~) 0.010s (+7.8% 🔺) 1.023s (-8.3% 🟢) 0.422s 59 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.617s 1.027s 0.006s 1.041s 0.425s 58 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.640s (+1.7%) 1.005s (~) 0.013s (+232.3% 🔺) 1.034s (+1.1%) 0.394s 59 1.07x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.653s (+4.7%) 1.023s (+1.6%) 0.004s (-7.4% 🟢) 1.042s (+1.9%) 0.389s 58 1.09x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.691s 1.011s 0.010s 1.024s 0.333s 59 1.15x
💻 Local Express 0.772s (+2.0%) 1.012s (-1.6%) 0.012s (+29.8% 🔺) 1.026s (-1.3%) 0.254s 59 1.29x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.921s 1.092s 0.000s 1.099s 0.177s 55 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.955s (-1.4%) 1.219s (-2.3%) 0.000s (-51.0% 🟢) 1.244s (-1.1%) 0.289s 49 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.993s (+3.3%) 1.358s (+6.3% 🔺) 0.000s (-47.7% 🟢) 1.373s (+5.1% 🔺) 0.379s 44 1.08x
💻 Local Express 1.298s (+6.0% 🔺) 2.023s (~) 0.001s (+50.0% 🔺) 2.025s (~) 0.727s 30 1.41x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.309s 2.021s 0.001s 2.024s 0.715s 30 1.42x
💻 Local Nitro 1.362s (+11.4% 🔺) 2.020s (~) 0.000s (+185.7% 🔺) 2.201s (+8.9% 🔺) 0.839s 28 1.48x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.764s 2.071s 0.000s 2.090s 0.326s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.799s (~) 2.219s (+3.6%) 0.000s (+3.7%) 2.246s (+3.3%) 0.447s 27 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.828s (+3.1%) 2.142s (-1.6%) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 2.160s (-1.8%) 0.332s 28 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 3.408s (+0.6%) 4.102s (+1.7%) 0.001s (+37.5% 🔺) 4.105s (+1.7%) 0.697s 15 1.93x
💻 Local Express 3.669s (+5.8% 🔺) 4.100s (+1.6%) 0.001s (~) 4.103s (+1.6%) 0.434s 15 2.08x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 3.973s 4.318s 0.000s 4.322s 0.348s 14 2.25x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Nitro 18/21
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 17/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 19/21
Next.js (Turbopack) 🐘 Postgres 18/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 14/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the docs homepage hero copy and page metadata to reflect the new “React for the backend” positioning.

Changes:

  • Replaces the homepage hero title with “React for the backend”.
  • Updates the hero byline/description to emphasize long-running, durable, reliable, observable workflows and AI agents.
  • Updates the page metadata title to match the new hero title.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants