Skip to content

mangowc: update to 015.5 - #61649

Open
lsc-x wants to merge 2 commits into
void-linux:masterfrom
lsc-x:mangowc-update
Open

mangowc: update to 015.5#61649
lsc-x wants to merge 2 commits into
void-linux:masterfrom
lsc-x:mangowc-update

Conversation

@lsc-x

@lsc-x lsc-x commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: YES

Local build testing

  • I built this PR locally for my native architecture, x86_64-glibc

@lsc-x

lsc-x commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

in addition to the version bump, what would be required to change the package name from mangowc to mangowm to match the upstream package? I understand the change in the template, however, to allow for a smooth upgrade path for users, if that's even possible.

Comment thread common/shlibs

@Duncaen Duncaen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please squash the common/shlibs changes into the the update commit.

@lsc-x
lsc-x force-pushed the mangowc-update branch 3 times, most recently from 7c74fe5 to 86d51b1 Compare July 26, 2026 19:53
@lsc-x
lsc-x requested a review from Duncaen July 26, 2026 19:53
@lsc-x

lsc-x commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

apologies for the noise on that. fixed

@dogknowsnx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Maintainer ping @realcharmer

Why cmake? There's also #61453 addressing swayfx

@lsc-x

lsc-x commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Maintainer ping @realcharmer

Why cmake? There's also #61453 addressing swayfx

Corrected. I mistakenly placed it in both templates. Also, I searched and didn't see #61453, seems I've duplicated efforts. Should this PR be closed and stick to that one?

@dogknowsnx

dogknowsnx commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Corrected. I mistakenly placed it in both templates. Also, I searched and didn't see #61453, seems I've duplicated efforts. Should this PR be closed and stick to that one?

Well, both PRs are incomplete and not ready to be merged
(Also regarding cmake, scenefx uses the meson build system, as well)

@realcharmer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the ping. I haven't submitted an update for mangowc since #61453 has to be merged first.

@lsc-x

lsc-x commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Corrected. I mistakenly placed it in both templates. Also, I searched and didn't see #61453, seems I've duplicated efforts. Should this PR be closed and stick to that one?

Well, both PRs are incomplete and not ready to be merged (Also regarding cmake, scenefx uses the meson build system, as well)

that was also a carry over from building locally from the git clone of the project. removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants