Skip to content

feat(cli): use Unicode tree glyphs in toolchain output - #2442

Open
liangmiQwQ wants to merge 1 commit into
voidzero-dev:mainfrom
liangmiQwQ:liang/codex/toolchain-tree-style
Open

feat(cli): use Unicode tree glyphs in toolchain output#2442
liangmiQwQ wants to merge 1 commit into
voidzero-dev:mainfrom
liangmiQwQ:liang/codex/toolchain-tree-style

Conversation

@liangmiQwQ

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#2111 introduces vp toolchain command. However, its output and connector chars are all old ASCII-style.

Considering other parts of Vite+ uses unicode a lot, I don't think it is an intentional design for compatibility. Unicode-style (├──, └──, and ) is more modern and feels like more professional. So this PR updates it to this style

🤖 Generated with Codex

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for viteplus-preview canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f20070a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/viteplus-preview/deploys/6a7dc02f1de94100080e3808

@liangmiQwQ

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Compare:
image
image

@liangmiQwQ

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll.

Reviewed commit: f20070a1f6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@liangmiQwQ
liangmiQwQ marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2026 13:22
@liangmiQwQ
liangmiQwQ requested a review from fengmk2 August 13, 2026 13:22
@jong-kyung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Compare: image image

I love it

@liangmiQwQ

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Thanks :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants