Stop ignoring tests

[robert3005]

These were ignored for reasons unknown. I removed ignores, fixed one case of
actually failing test and converted one of them to an expected panic

fix #7835

[connortsui20]

This doesn't seem right? Is this actually the correct behavior?

[robert3005]

it's not the correct behaviour but instead of ignoring the test we let it run and assert it panics. This should be fixed and if someone fixes it this test will start failing

[connortsui20]

Sure, but now nobody is tracking this issue? And now we are overloading should_panic with both "this is a test that should panic" and "this is a bug that someone needs to fix, without an actual reason". That was why I had those ignores, because they are easy to find.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 19.63%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 5 improved benchmarks
✅ 1203 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	patched_take_10k_adversarial	261.2 µs	230.9 µs	+13.12%
⚡	Simulation	patched_take_10k_dispersed	318.4 µs	288.1 µs	+10.52%
⚡	Simulation	patched_take_10k_first_chunk_only	304.7 µs	274.4 µs	+11.06%
⚡	Simulation	take_10k_first_chunk_only	273.1 µs	228.3 µs	+19.63%
⚡	Simulation	take_10k_dispersed	286.7 µs	241.8 µs	+18.55%

---

_{Comparing rk/ignores (9fffef6) with develop (b212667)}