Add brokerless MPC ceremony inspection and receipts - #4
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack
This is a stacked PR based on #1. After #1 merges, retarget this PR to
main.What changed
inspectcommand added by Audit hardening: validation, gate alignment, and operational fixes for the ceremony #1.Why
Relay's brokerless, role-scoped storage flow needs stable machine-readable projections and canonical operational records, but Relay should not duplicate ceremony parsing, identity interpretation, signature verification, closure validation, or record construction. These commands keep those trust-boundary responsibilities inside proof-tool and add no networking or Relay-specific storage code.
Security properties
Validation
go test ./internal/mpcceremonygo test ./cmd/mpc-ceremony -skip '^TestProductionCeremonySourceAndBinaryExcludeWalletSecretAPIs$'go test ./internal/keybundlegit diff --checkThe exact CLI package command still reaches the repository's existing inconsistent
vendor/modules.txtboundary failure. The broader compile sweep also retains the existingfft.WithCosetTabledependency mismatch ininternal/msmengine; neither dependency surface is changed here.